Anti-swirl gas dampers have applications in high-temperature turbomachinery. Nozzles comprising the circumference of the damper inject air against the direction of shaft rotation, providing a force tangential to the rotor surface that acts to damp rotor vibration. The present work involves prediction of experiments by using direct damping and cross-coupled stiffness coefficients given in Vance and Handy (1997) that characterize the rotordynamic performance of an anti-swirl damper. Direct stiffness added at the damper location is vital to representing the changes in critical speeds and the onset and cease of backward whirl given in the experiments. This direct stiffness arises due to the release of air axially across the annulus of the damper. With the addition of this significant direct stiffness, experimental results compare well with the present rotordynamic model. Predictions using the experimentally obtained damping coefficients adequately reproduce the reduction in vibration amplitudes at the critical speeds. However, applying the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients in predictions fails to show increases in the speed at which backward whirl begins and does not reproduce the wrecking instability experienced in the tests. A further study investigates the magnitude of the cross-coupled stiffness coefficient necessary to cause instability in the rotor-damper system.

1.
Brown, R. D., and Hart, J. A., 1986, “A Novel Form of Damper for Turbo-Machinery,” Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, pp. 325–347 (also NASA C.P. 2443).
2.
Childs, D., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3.
Handy, S. B., 1992, “An Experimental Investigation of a Swirl Gas Damper for Turbomachinery,” Master of Science thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
4.
Muszynska, A., 1985, “Anti-Swirling Demonstration,” Instability in Rotating Machinery, NASA C. P. 2409, pp. 423–426.
5.
Muszynska
A.
, and
Bently
D. E.
,
1989
, “
Anti-Swirl Arrangements Prevent Rotor/Seal Instability
,”
ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design
, Vol.
111
, pp.
156
162
.
6.
Muszynska
A.
,
Franklin
W. D.
, and
Bently
D. E.
,
1988
, “
Rotor Active ‘Anti-Swirl’ Control
,”
ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design
, Vol.
110
, pp.
143
161
.
7.
Murphy, B., 1995, XLRotor, rotordynamics software package, Rotating Machinery Analysis, Inc., Austin, TX.
8.
San Andre´s
L.
,
1991
, “
Analysis of Variable Fluid Properties, Turbulent Annular Seals
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
113
, pp.
694
702
.
9.
San Andre´s
L.
, and
Childs
D.
,
1997
, “
Angled Injection—Hydrostatic Bearings, Analysis and Comparison to Test Results
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
119
, No.
1
, pp.
179
187
.
10.
Vance, J., 1988, Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11.
Vance, J., and Handy, S., 1997, “Rotordynamic Instability from an Anti-Swirl Device,” ASME Paper 97-GT-498.
12.
Yang
Z., L.
,
San Andre´s
, and
Childs
D.
,
1994
, “
Dynamic Force Performance of Gas Seals at Off-Center Conditions
,”
STLE Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
37
, No.
1
, pp.
33
44
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.