Oil-free microturbomachinery (OFT) implements compliant foil bearings because of their minute drag and ability to operate in extreme (high or low) temperature. Prominent to date, bump-foil thrust bearings integrate an underspring thin metal structure that provides resilience and material damping, and while the rotor is airborne, it acts in series with the stiffness and damping of the gas film. The design and manufacturing of foil bearings remain costly as it demands extensive engineering and actual experience. Alternative foil bearing configurations, less costly and easier to manufacture, are highly desirable to enable widespread usage of OFT. This paper details the design and manufacturing of a novel Rayleigh-step metal mesh foil thrust bearing (MMFTB) as well as its testing on a dedicated rig. Metal mesh structures offer significant material structural damping and can be easily procured at a fraction of the cost of a typical bump-foil strip layer. The MMFTB consists of a solid carrier, a number of stacked annular copper mesh sheets (wire diameter = 0.25, 0.3, and 0.41 mm), and a steel top foil (0.127 mm thick) that makes six pads (ID = 50.8 mm, OD =2 ID), each 45 deg in extent. A 3 μm polymer coats each pad, and a photochemical process etches a step 20 μm in height. Static and dynamic load measurements (without rotor speed) demonstrate that the MMFTB has structural stiffness and material damping similar to that of a publicized bump-type foil thrust bearing. A maiden test of the MMFTB with rotor speed of Ω = 15 krpm (∼80 m/s at bearing outer diameter (OD)) proved briefly the bearing operation when applying a tiny thrust load. Further tests with ambient air, a rotor speed of 40 krpm (∼212 m/s at bearing OD), and a very light load/area <7 kPa failed several of the prototype bearings, all exhibiting significant wear on one or more pads. The source of the failure is the inherent unevenness of the metal mesh stacked substructures, thus causing the pads to bulge toward the rotor collar surface before a load applies. A deficient anchoring method exacerbates the unevenness. Incidentally, a high rotor speed induced large windage that lifted the top foils pushing them against the spinning collar. As the bearing moved toward the rotating collar to begin applying thrust, the local high spots rubbed against the collar before a hydrodynamic wedge could form to separate the surfaces. Without a robust sacrificial coating, metal-to-metal contact quickly disfigured the contacting top foil pads, erasing the etched step, and leading to failure. In concept, and on paper, the mesh sheets and the top foil lay flat against the bearing carrier, giving a false sense of uniformity in the design process. In actuality, a designer must consider the manufactured states of the individual components and how they assemble. A redesign of the bearing intends to overcome the existing flaws (highlighted herein) by incorporating a thicker top foil that is well anchored (to better withstand the effects of windage), a robust sacrificial coating, and a hydrodynamic wedge accomplished via a circumferential taper on each pad.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2018
Research-Article
On the Design, Manufacture, and Premature Failure of a Metal Mesh Foil Thrust Bearing—How Concepts That Work on Paper, Actually Do Not
Travis A. Cable,
Travis A. Cable
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: cable.travis@gmail.com
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: cable.travis@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Luis San Andrés
Luis San Andrés
Fellow ASME
Mast-Childs Chair Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: Lsanandres@tamu.edu
Mast-Childs Chair Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: Lsanandres@tamu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Travis A. Cable
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: cable.travis@gmail.com
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: cable.travis@gmail.com
Luis San Andrés
Fellow ASME
Mast-Childs Chair Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: Lsanandres@tamu.edu
Mast-Childs Chair Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: Lsanandres@tamu.edu
Manuscript received July 3, 2018; final manuscript received July 18, 2018; published online October 22, 2018. Editor: Jerzy T. Sawicki.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Dec 2018, 140(12): 121007 (13 pages)
Published Online: October 22, 2018
Article history
Received:
July 3, 2018
Revised:
July 18, 2018
Citation
Cable, T. A., and San Andrés, L. (October 22, 2018). "On the Design, Manufacture, and Premature Failure of a Metal Mesh Foil Thrust Bearing—How Concepts That Work on Paper, Actually Do Not." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. December 2018; 140(12): 121007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041137
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
A Multi-Stage Nonlinear Method for Aeroengine Health Parameter Estimation Based on Adjacent Operating Points
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
A Combined Experimental and Turbulence-Resolved Modeling Approach for Aeroengine Turbine Rim Seals
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (August 2024)
Related Articles
Novel Thrust Foil Bearing With Pocket Grooves for Enhanced Static Performance
J. Tribol (November,2021)
Effect of Foil Geometry on the Static Performance of Thrust Foil Bearings
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (August,2018)
Analysis of Gas Lubricated Compliant Thrust Bearings
J. of Lubrication Tech (October,1983)
Metal Mesh Foil Bearing: Effect of Motion Amplitude, Rotor Speed, Static Load, and Excitation Frequency on Force Coefficients
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2011)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Design of Mechanical Bearings in Cardiac Assist Devices
Average Shaft Centerline Plots
Fundamentals of Rotating Machinery Diagnostics
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition