This study presents a detailed exhaust emission characterization of a 2-Stroke turbocharged line haul locomotive diesel engine fitted with an early-development Tier 0 + emissions kit. The objective of this work is to use emissions characterization to gain insight into engine operation and mechanisms of pollutant formation for this family of engine, and identify areas of potential future engine emissions improvement. Results show that at the notches tested (notches 3–8) the largest contributor to particulate matter (PM)mass is insolubles (mostly elemental carbon), but that the soluble component of PM, comprising 14–32% of PM, is also significant. Gas chromatography (GC) analysis of the soluble portion shows that it is composed of 55–77% oil-like C22–C30+ hydrocarbons, with the remainder being fuel-like C9–C21 hydrocarbons. The emissions characterization suggests that advancing combustion timing should be effective in reducing PM mass by reducing the insoluble portion (elemental carbon) of PM at all notches. NOx will likely increase, but the current level of NOx is sufficiently below Tier 0+ limits to allow a moderate increase. Reducing engine oil consumption should also reduce PM mass at all notches, although to a smaller degree than measures that reduce the insoluble portion of PM.

References

1.
US EPA, 1998, “Locomotive Emission Standards: Regulatory Document,” U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. Available at: www.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/locomotv/frm/locorsd.pdfwww.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/locomotv/frm/locorsd.pdf.
2.
US EPA, 2008, “
Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Locomotive Engines and Marine Compression-Ignition Engines Less Than 30 Liters per Cylinder; Republication
,” Federal Register,
73
(
126
), pp.
37295
37344
.
3.
US EPA, 2012, “
Engine-Testing Procedures - Emission Calculations
,” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 1065, Section 650. Available at: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=294c0fba9e7bfe2b6a01d507941b4952&rgn=div8&view=text&node=40:33.0.1.1.13.7.29.9&idno=40.
4.
US EPA, 2012, “
Control of Emissions from Locomotives - Duty Cycles and Calculations
,” Code of Federal Regulatoins, Title 40, Part 1033, Section 530. Available at: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=f0ec8701d5a3298b73be600bb42db22b&rgn=div8&view=text&node=40:33.0.1.1.2.6.1.7&idno=40.
5.
Westerholm
,
R.
,
Almén
,
J.
, and
Li
,
H.
, 1991, “
Chemical and Biological Characterization of Particulate-, Semivolatile-, and Gas-Phase-Associated Compounds in Diluted Heavy-Duty Diesel Exhausts: A Comparison of Three Different Semivolatile-Phase Samplers
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
25
, pp.
332
338
.
6.
Siegl
,
W.
,
Hammerle
,
R.
,
Herrmann
,
H.
,
Wenclawiak
,
B.
, and
Luers-Jongen
,
B.
Organic Emissions Profile for a Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle
,”
Atmos. Environ.
,
33
, pp.
797
805
.
7.
Schauer
,
J. J.
,
Kleeman
,
M. J.
,
Cass
,
G. R.
, and
Simoneit
,
B. R. T.
, 1999, “
Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 2. C1 through C30 Organic Compounds from Medium-Duty Diesel Trucks
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
33
, pp.
1578
1587
.
8.
Shah
,
S. D.
,
Ogunyoku
,
T. A.
,
Miller
,
J. W.
, and
Cocker
,
D. R.
, III
, 2005, “
On-Road Emission Rates of PAH and n-alkane Compounds from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
39
, pp.
5276
5284
.
9.
Han
,
M.
,
Assanis
,
D. N.
,
Jacobs
,
T. J.
, and
Bohac
,
S. V.
, 2008, “
Method and Detailed Analysis of Individual Hydrocarbon Species from Diesel Combustion Modes and Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
130
(
4
), pp.
042803
-1–042803-
10
.
10.
Northrop
,
W. F.
,
Madathil
,
P. V.
,
Bohac
,
S. V.
, and
Assanis
,
D. N.
, 2011, “
Condensational Growth of Particulate Matter from Partially Premixed Low Temperature Combustion of Biodiesel in a Compression Ignition Engine
,”
Aerosol Sci. Technol.
,
45
(
1
), pp.
26
36
.
11.
Sawant
,
A. A.
,
Nigam
,
A.
,
Miller
,
J. W.
,
Johnson
,
K. C.
, and
Cocker
,
D. R.
, III
, 2007, “
Regulated and Non-Regulated Emissions from In-Use Diesel-Electric Switching Locomotives
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
41
, pp.
6074
6083
.
12.
Hedrick
,
J.
, 2007, “
Locomotive Particulate Matter Emissions Reduction Through Application of Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the Locomotive Maintenance Officers’ Association
, September
13
14
.
13.
Bagley
,
S. T.
,
Gratz
,
L. D.
,
Johnson
,
J. H.
, and
McDonald
,
J. F.
, 1998, “
Effects of an Oxidation Catalytic Converter and a Biodiesel Fuel on the Chemical, Mutagenic, and Particle Size Characteristics of Emissions from a Diesel Engine
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
32
, pp.
1183
1191
.
14.
Markworth
,
V. O.
,
Fritz
,
S. G.
, and
Cataldi
,
G. R.
, 1992, “
The Effect of Injection Timing, Enhanced Aftercooling, and Low-Sulfur, Low-Aromatic Diesel Fuel on Locomotive Exhaust Emissions
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
114
(
3
), pp.
488
495
.
15.
Froelund
,
K.
,
Fritz
,
K. S.
, and
Smith
,
B.
, 2003, “
Lubricating Oil Consumption Measurements on an EMD 16-645E Locomotive Diesel Engine
,” ASME Paper No. ICE2003-549.
You do not currently have access to this content.