Performance analysis and diagnosis for gas turbines usually assume the use of detailed design specifications or similar kinds of information for building and configuring engine models. This allows the nonlinearity of gas turbine performance characteristics to be taken into account. However, this approach tends to make it difficult for users of industrial gas turbines to analyze performance because (1) detailed design specifications are not necessarily supplied to the users, and (2) even if they were available, use of these kinds of information may often lead to complex procedures for model building and for making adjustments and configurations that all require high expertise. The purpose of this paper was to propose a direct modeling approach based only on operating data and not requiring a priori information like manufacturer-supplied specifications while preserving sufficient accuracy. The core element of this approach was the automatic identification and selection of base load operating data from various operating conditions. A set of load estimation algorithms was proposed. They were applied to 31,000h of operating data for two types of engines, which involved actual failure occurrences, and subsequent performance modeling and analysis were carried out. The following results were obtained. (1) The relative performance trends obtained revealed the quantitative extent of degradation during operation and of recovery by repair or engine change. (2) The performance trends gave a good account of actual failures. (3) The accuracy of the performance modeling measured by the 99th percentile of error was on the order of 1%. The proposed direct modeling approach offers sufficient accuracy to quantify the gradual degradation of performance and its recovery by maintenance. The performance trends obtained are useful for further fault diagnosis.

1.
Urban
,
L. A.
, 1975, “
Parameter Selection for Multiple Fault Diagnostics of Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
74-GT-62
, pp.
225
230
.
2.
Li
,
Y. G.
, 2002, “
Performance-Analysis-Based Gas Turbine Diagnostics: A Review
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
216
(
5
), pp.
363
377
.
3.
Diakunchak
,
I. S.
, 1992, “
Performance Deterioration in Industrial Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
114
(
2
), pp.
161
168
.
4.
Lakshminarasimha
,
A. N.
,
Boyce
,
M. P.
, and
Meher-Homji
,
C. B.
, 1994, “
Modeling and Analysis of Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
116
(
1
), pp.
46
52
.
5.
Gulen
,
S. C.
,
Griffin
,
P. R.
, and
Paolucci
,
S.
, 2000, “
Real-Time On-Line Performance Diagnostics of Heavy-Duty Industrial Gas Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-312.
6.
Gustafsson
,
J. O.
, 2006, “
Condition and Performance Monitoring of Turbo Machinery by Thermodynamic Modeling
,”
Joint Baltic-Nordic Acoustics Meeting 2006
,
Gothenburg, Sweden
, Nov. 8–10.
7.
Zwebek
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2003, “
Degradation Effects on Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance—Part I: Gas Turbine Cycle Component Degradation Effects
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
125
(
3
), pp.
651
657
.
8.
Zwebek
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2003, “
Degradation Effects on Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance—Part II: Steam Turbine Cycle Component Degradation Effects
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
125
(
3
), pp.
658
663
.
9.
Zwebek
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2004, “
Degradation Effects on Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance—Part III: Gas and Steam Turbine Component Degradation Effects
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
126
(
2
), pp.
306
315
.
10.
Kamboukos
,
Ph.
, and
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, 2005, “
Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Gas Turbine Performance Diagnostics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
127
(
1
), pp.
49
56
.
11.
Taguchi
,
G.
, and
Jugulum
,
R.
, 2002,
The Mahalanobis-Taguchi Strategy: A Pattern Technology System
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.