Leading-edge protuberances on airfoils or wings have been considered as a viable passive control method for flow separation. In this paper, the aerodynamic performance of a modified airfoil with a single leading-edge protuberance was investigated and compared with the baseline NACA 634-021 airfoil. Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model was applied for the numerical simulation. Compared to the sharp decline of baseline lift coefficient, the stall angle of the modified foil decreased and the decline of the lift coefficient became mild. The poststall performance of the modified airfoil was improved, while the prestall performance was declined. Asymmetric flows along the spanwise direction were observed on the modified airfoil, and the local region around one shoulder of the protuberance suffered from leading-edge separation at prestall angles of attack, which may be responsible for the performance decline. At poststall angles of attack, the attached flows along the peak of the protuberance with a sideward velocity component would help improving the total performance of the airfoil. Experimental visualization methods, including surface tuft and smoke flow, were performed, and the asymmetric flow pattern past the protuberance was successfully captured. This specific phenomenon may be largely related to the formation of the biperiodic condition and other complicated flow patterns induced by multiple leading-edge protuberances. The formation mechanism and suppression method of the symmetry breaking phenomenon should be investigated more deeply in the future to guide the practical application of this passive control method.

References

1.
Fish
,
F. E.
, and
Battle
,
J. M.
,
1995
, “
Hydrodynamic Design of the Humpback Whale Flipper
,”
J. Morphol.
,
225
(
1
), pp.
51
60
.
2.
Fish
,
F. E.
, and
Lauder
,
G. V.
,
2006
, “
Passive and Active Flow Control by Swimming Fishes and Mammals
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
38
(
1
), pp.
193
224
.
3.
Fish
,
F. E.
,
Howle
,
L. E.
, and
Murray
,
M. M.
,
2008
, “
Hydrodynamic Flow Control in Marine Mammals
,”
Integr. Comp. Biol.
,
48
(
6
), pp.
788
800
.
4.
Fish
,
F. E.
,
Weber
,
P. W.
,
Murray
,
M. M.
, and
Laurens
,
E. H.
,
2011
, “
The Tubercles on Humpback Whales' Flippers: Application of Bio-Inspired Technology
,”
Integr. Comp. Biol.
,
51
(
1
), pp.
203
213
.
5.
Fish
,
F. E.
,
1999
, “
Performance Constraints on the Maneuverability of Flexible and Rigid Biological Systems
,”
Eleventh International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology
, Aug. 23–25, pp.
394
406
.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary;jsessionid=5544CB2F1A0DBFF4A40FF69F82257DCF?doi=10.1.1.538.6283
6.
Miklosovic
,
D. S.
,
Murray
,
M. M.
,
Howle
,
L. E.
, and
Fish
,
F. E.
,
2004
, “
Leading-Deg Tubercles Delay Stall on Humpback Whale (Megaptera Novaeangliae) Flippers
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
16
(
5
), pp.
39
42
.
7.
Johari
,
H.
,
Henoch
,
C.
,
Custodio
,
D.
, and
Levshin
,
A.
,
2007
, “
Effects of Leading-Edge Protuberances on Airfoil Performance
,”
AIAA J.
,
45
(
11
), pp.
2634
2642
.
8.
Johari
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Applications of Hydrofoils With Leading Edge Protuberances
,” Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, Technical Report No.
N00014-08-1-1043
.http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a563228.pdf
9.
Hansen
,
K. L.
,
Kelso
,
R. M.
, and
Dally
,
B. B.
,
2011
, “
Performance Variations of Leading-Edge Tubercles for Distinct Airfoil Profiles
,”
AIAA J.
,
49
(
1
), pp.
185
194
.
10.
Custodio
,
D. S.
,
2007
, “
The Effect of Humpback Whale-Like Leading Edge Protuberances on Hydrofoil Performance
,”
M.S. thesis
, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.http://www.abstract.dislib.info/a2-technical/2317571-5-the-effect-humpback-whale-like-leading-edge-protuberances-hydrofoi.php
11.
Zhang
,
M. M.
,
Wang
,
G. F.
, and
Xu
,
J. Z.
,
2014
, “
Experimental Study of Flow Separation Control on a Low-Re Airfoil Using Leading-Edge Protuberance Method
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
55
(
4
), pp.
1
13
.
12.
Cai
,
C.
,
Zuo
,
Z. G.
,
Liu
,
S. H.
, and
Wu
,
Y. L.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Investigations of Hydrodynamic Performance of Hydrofoils With Leading-Edge Protuberances
,”
Adv. Mech. Eng.
,
7
(
7
), pp. 1–11.
13.
Wei
,
Z. Y.
,
New
,
T. H.
, and
Cui
,
Y. D.
,
2015
, “
An Experimental Study on Flow Separation Control of Hydrofoils With Leading-Edge Tubercles at Low Reynolds Number
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
108
, pp.
336
349
.
14.
Dropkin
,
A.
,
Custodio
,
D.
,
Henoch
,
C. W.
, and
Johari
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Computation of Flow Field Around an Airfoil With Leading-Edge Protuberances
,”
J. Aircr.
,
49
(
5
), pp.
1345
1355
.
15.
Li
,
Q. A.
,
Kamada
,
Y.
,
Maeda
,
T.
,
Murata
,
J.
, and
Nishida
,
Y.
,
2016
, “
Visualization of the Flow Field and Aerodynamic Force on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine in Turbulent Inflows
,”
Energy
,
111
, pp.
57
67
.
16.
ANSYS FLUENT, 2009, “
ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Theory Guide
,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
17.
Gursul
,
I.
,
2005
, “
Review of Unsteady Vortex Flows Over Slender Delta Wings
,”
J. Aircr.
,
42
(
2
), pp.
299
319
.
You do not currently have access to this content.