A movable flap with a NACA foil cross section serves as a common control surface for underwater marine vehicles. To augment the functionality of the control surface, a tab assisted control (TAC) surface was experimentally tested to improve its performance especially at large angles of operation. The advantage of the TAC foil could be further enhanced with shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators to control the rear portion of the control surface to form a flexible tab (or FlexTAC) surface. Hybrid unstructured Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations were used to understand the flow physics associated with the multi-element FlexTAC foil with a stabilizer, a flap, and a flexible tab. The prediction results were also compared with the measured data obtained from both the TAC and the FlexTAC experiments. The simulations help explain subtle differences in performance of the multi-element airfoil concepts. The RANS solutions also predict the forces and moments on the surface of the hydrofoil with reasonable accuracy and the RANS procedure is found to be critical for use in a design optimization framework because of the importance of flow separation/turbulent effects in the gap region between the stabilizer and the flap. A systematic optimization study was also carried out with a genetic algorithm (GA) based design optimization procedure. This procedure searches the complex design landscape in an efficient and parallel manner. The fitness evaluations in the optimization procedure were performed with the RANS based CFD simulations. The mesh regeneration was carried out in an automated manner through a scripting process within the grid generator. The optimization calculation is performed simultaneously on both the stabilizer and the nonflexible portion of the flap. Shape changes to the trailing edge of the stabilizer strongly influence the secondary flow patterns that set up in the gap region between the stabilizer and the flap. They were found to have a profound influence on force and moment characteristics of the multi-element airfoil. A new control surface (OptimTAC) was constructed as a result of the design optimization calculation and was shown to have improved lift, drag, and torque characteristics over the original FlexTAC airfoil at high flap angles.

1.
Carpenter
,
B.
, and
Nguyen
,
T.
, 1999, “
Shape Memory Alloy Actuator for Tab Assisted Control Surface Application
,”
Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Materials 1999
, Newport Beach, CA, Vol. 3674, March 2–4.
2.
Nguyen
,
T. D.
,
Gowing
,
S.
, and
Bochinski
,
D.
, 1999, “
Tab-Assisted Control Surface for Marine Application
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Warship ’99 Naval Submarines
.
3.
Gowing
,
S.
,
Lee
,
Y. T.
,
Carpenter
,
B.
,
Atsavapranee
,
P.
, and
Hess
,
D.
, 2004, “
FlexTAC: An Advanced Submarine Control Surface and Actuation System
,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-902.
4.
Lee
,
Y. T.
,
Ahuja
,
V.
,
Ebert
,
M.
, and
Hosangadi
,
A.
, 2003, “
Flow Predictions and Shape Optimization of A Multi-Element Airfoil
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics
, Busan, Korea (South), pp. 22–25.
5.
Sung
,
C. H.
, and
Rhee
,
B.
, 1999, “
Prediction of Forces and Moments of Rudders With Flap and Tab, Part I. 2D Airfoil with Flap and Tab
,”
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics
, Nantes, France, Jul. 19–22.
6.
Sung
,
C. H.
,
Rhee
,
B.
, and
Koh
,
I. -Y.
, 2000, “
Validation of Tab Assisted Control Surface Computation
,”
Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
, Bassin D’essair Des Carenes, Val De Reuil, France, Sep. 17–22.
7.
Hosangadi
,
A.
,
Lee
,
R. A.
,
York
,
B. J.
,
Sinha
,
N.
, and
Dash
,
S. M.
, 1996, “
Upwind Unstructured Scheme for Three-Dimensional Combusting Flows
,”
J. Propulsion Power
,
12
(
3
), pp.
494
502
.
8.
Hyams
,
D. G.
,
Sreenivas
,
K.
,
Sheng
,
C.
,
Nichols
,
S.
,
Taylor
,
L. K.
,
Briley
,
W. R.
,
Marcum
,
D. L.
, and
Whitfield
,
D. L.
, 2002, “
An Unstructured Multielement Solution Algorithm for Complex Geometry Hydrodynamic Simulations
,”
Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
, Fukuoka, Japan, Jul. 8–13.
9.
Ahuja
,
V.
,
Hosangadi
,
A.
, and
Arunajatesan
,
S.
, 2001, “
Simulations of Cavitating Flows Using Hybrid Unstructured Meshes
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
123
(
2
), pp.
331
340
.
10.
Lee
,
Y. T.
,
Ebert
,
M. P.
, and
Hosangadi
,
A.
, 2002 “
Flow Predictions for Multi-Element Control Surface
,” NSWCCD Report No. NSWCCD-50-TR-2002/061.
11.
Goldberg
,
D. E.
, 1989, “
Genetic Algorithms in Search
,”
Optimization, and Machine Learning
,
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
.
12.
Sbalzarini
,
I. F.
,
Muller
,
S. D.
,
Koumoutsakos
,
P. D.
, and
Cottet
,
G. -H.
, 2001, “
Evolutionary Strategies for Computational and Experimental Fluid Dynamic Applications
,”
Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 7–11.
13.
Ray
,
T.
, and
Tsai
,
H. M.
, 2004, “
Swarm Algorithm for Single- and Multiobjective Airfoil Design Optimization
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
42
(
2
), pp.
366
373
.
14.
Obayashi
,
S.
, and
Takanashi
,
S.
, 1996, “
Genetic Optimization of Target Pressure Distributions for Inverse Design Methods
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
34
(
5
), pp.
881
886
.
15.
Jones
,
B. R.
,
Crossley
,
W. A.
, and
Lyrintzis
,
A. S.
, 1998, “
Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Optimization of Airfoils via a Parallel Genetic Algorithm
,” AIAA Paper No. 98-4811.
16.
Pointwise Inc.
, 2003, GRIDGEN User’s Manual, Version 15.
17.
Holland
,
J. H.
, 1992,
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
,
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
18.
Carroll
,
D. L.
, 1995, “
Modeling High Pressure Chemical Oxygen-Iodine Lasers
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
33
(
8
), pp.
1454
1462
.
19.
Fonseca
,
C. M.
, and
Fleming
,
P. J.
, 1995, “
An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multi-Objective Optimization
,”
Evol. Comput.
1063-6560,
3
, pp.
1
16
.
20.
Deb
,
K.
, 2002,
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
21.
Cavallo
,
P. A.
,
Hosangadi
,
A.
,
Lee
,
R. A.
, and
Dash
,
S. M.
, 1997, “
Dynamics Unstructured Grid Methodology With Application to Aero/Propulsive Flowfields
,” AIAA Paper No. 97-2310.
You do not currently have access to this content.