The origin of oscillatory convergence in finite difference methods is investigated. Fairly simple implicit schemes are used to solve the steady one-dimensional convection-diffusion equation with variable coefficients, and possible scenarios are shown that exhibit the oscillatory convergence. Also, a manufactured solution to difference equations is formulated that exhibits desired oscillatory behavior in grid convergence, with a varying formal order of accuracy. This model-error equation is used to statistically assess the performance of several methods of extrapolation. Alternative extrapolation schemes, such as the deferred extrapolation to limit technique, to calculate the coefficients in the Taylor series expansion of the error function are also considered. A new method is proposed that is based on the extrapolation of approximate error, and is shown to be a viable alternative to other methods. This paper elucidates the problem of oscillatory convergence, and brings a new perspective to the problem of estimating discretization error by optimizing the information from a minimum number of calculations.

1.
Richardson
,
L. F.
, 1910, “
The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, With an Application to the Stresses In a Masonry Dam
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
0962-8428
210
, pp.
307
357
.
2.
Richardson
,
L. F.
, and
Gaunt
,
J. A.
, 1927, “
The Deferred Approach to the Limit
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
0962-8428
226
, pp.
299
361
.
3.
Celik
,
I.
,
Chen
,
C. J.
,
Roache
,
P. J.
, and
Scheurer
,
G.
, eds., 1993, “
Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics
,”
ASME Fluids Engineering Div. Summer Meeting
,
158
, Washington, DC, June 20-24.
4.
Roache
,
P. J.
, 1993, “
A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies
,”
Proc. of Symp. on Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics
, ASME, New York,
I.
Celik
et al.
, eds.,
ASME Fluids Engineering Div. Summer Meeting
,
158
, Washington DC, June 20-24, pp.
109
120
.
5.
Roache
,
P. J.
, 1998,
Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering
,
Hermosa Publishers
, Albuquerque.
6.
Celik
,
I.
, and
Zhang
,
W. M
, 1993, “
Application of Richardson Extrapolation to Some Simple Turbulent Flow Calculations
,”
Proc. of Symp. on Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics
, ASME, New York,
I.
Celik
et al.
, eds.,
ASME Fluids Engineering Div. Summer Meeting
,
158
, Washington, DC, June 20–24, pp.
29
38
.
7.
Celik
,
I.
, and
Karatekin
,
O.
, 1997, “
Numerical Experiments on Application of Richardson Extrapolation With Nonuniform Grids
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
119
, pp.
584
590
.
8.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R. V.
,
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Paterson
,
E. G.
, 2001, “
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations: Part 1. Methodology and Procedures
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
123
, pp.
793
802
.
9.
Cadafalch
,
J.
,
Perez-Segarra
,
C. D.
,
Consul
,
R.
, and
Oliva
,
A.
, 2002, “
Verification of Finite Volume Computations on Steady-State Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
124
, pp.
11
21
.
10.
Eca
,
L.
, and
Hoekstra
,
M.
, 2002, “
An Evaluation of Verification Procedures for CFD Applications
,”
24th Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics
, Fukuoka, Japan, July 8–13.
11.
Celik
,
I.
, and
Li
,
J.
, 2004, “
Assessment of Numerical Uncertainty for the Calculations of Turbulent Flow over a Backward Facing Step
,”
Workshop on Uncertainty Estimation
, Lisbon, Oct. 21–22.
12.
Roy
,
C. J.
, 2003, private communication.
13.
Klein
,
M.
, 2004, private communication.
14.
Fox
,
L.
, 1957,
The Numerical Solution of Two-point Boundary Value Problems in ODE’s
,
Clarendon Press
, Oxford, pp.
332
.
15.
Phillips
,
G. M.
, and
Taylor
,
P. J.
, 1973,
Theory and Applications of Numerical Analysis
,
Academic Press
, New York, pp.
345
.
You do not currently have access to this content.