Richardson extrapolation has been applied to turbulent pipe flow and turbulent flow past a backward facing step. A commercial CFD code is used for this purpose. It is found that the application of the method is not straightforward and some aspects need careful consideration. Some of the problems are elucidated. The particular code used for the present application employs a hybrid scheme, and it does not give monotonic convergence for all the variables in all regions as the grid is refined. The flow regions and the variables which converge monotonically in these regions should be identified first before the method is applied. When this is done Richardson extrapolation gives good results in calculating the apparent order of the numerical procedure used, as well as obtaining grid independent results with which discretization error bounds can be calculated as measures of numerical uncertainty. Even in cases where it does not work, the method can be used as an error indicator for some obscured user mistakes. This paper also demonstrates several shortcomings of using commercial CFD codes. The present findings should help the users of CFD software in general, to quantify discretization errors in their calculations.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Turbulence, Uncertainty, Errors, Computational fluid dynamics, Computer software, Flow (Dynamics), Pipe flow
1.
Blottner
F. G.
,
1990
, “
Accurate Navier-Stokes Results for the Hypersonic Flow over a Spherical Nosetip
,”
J. Spacecraft and Rockets
, Vol.
27
, No.
2
, pp.
113
–
122
.
2.
Bradshaw, P., Launder, B. E., and Lumley, J. L., 1991, “Collaborative Testing of Turbulence Models,” AIAA 91-0215, 29th Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, NV, Jan. 7-10.
3.
Celik, I., 1989, “Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations: A Survey of Ideas and Opinions,” Paper presented at the forum on Methods for Estimating Uncertainty Limits in Fluid Flow Calculations, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 10–15.
4.
Celik, I., 1992, “Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations: An Assessment of Current Status and Basic Needs for Future Research,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Future Research Needs in Fluid Mechanics, ASME Fluids Engineering Division, Fluids Engineering Conference, Los Angeles, CA, June 21-26, pp. 27–30.
5.
Celik
I.
,
1993
, “
Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations: Needs for Future Research
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
115
, pp.
194
–
195
.
6.
Celik, I., Chen, C. J., Roache, P. J., and Scheuerer, G., 1993, “Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ASME Publication FED-Vol. 158, New York, NY.
7.
Celik, I., and Zhang, W-M., 1993, “Application of Richardson Extrapolation to Some Simple Turbulent Flow Calculations,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics, I. Celik et al. eds., ASME Fluids Engineering Division Spring Meeting, Washington, D.C., June-24, pp. 29–38.
8.
Caruso, S. C., Ferziger, J. H., and Oliger, J., 1985, “Adaptive Grid Techniques for Elliptic Flow Problems,” Rept. No. TF-23, Thermosciences Div., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
9.
Churchill
S. W.
,
Chao
P.
, and
Ozoe
H.
,
1981
, “
Extrapolation of Finite-Difference Calculations of Laminar Natural Convection in Enclosures to Zero Grid Size
,”
Numerical Heat Transfer
, Vol.
4
, pp.
39
–
51
.
10.
Dang, A. L., Kehtarnavaz, H., and Coats, D. E., 1989, “The Use of Richardson Extrapolation in PNS Solutions of Rocket Nozzle Flow,” AIAA Paper No. 89-2895, AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE 25th Joint Propulsion Conference, Monterey, CA, July 10-12.
11.
de Vahl Davis
G.
,
1983
, “
Natural Convection of Air in a Square Cavity: A Bench Mark Numerical Solution
,”
International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids
, Vol.
3
, pp.
249
–
264
.
12.
Demuren
A. O.
, and
Wilson
R. V.
,
1994
, “
Estimating Uncertainty in Computations of Two-Dimensional Separated Flows
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
116
, No.
2
, pp.
216
–
220
.
13.
Driver
D. M.
, and
Seegmiller
H. L.
,
1985
, “
Features of a Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer in Divergent Channel Flow
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
23
, No.
2
, Feb., pp.
163
–
171
.
14.
Durst, F., and Loy, T., 1984, “TEACH: Ein Berechnungsverfahren fuer Zweidimensionale Laminare und Turbulente Stroemungen,” Report, Institute fuer Universitaet Hydromechanik, Universitaet Karlsruhe, Germany.
15.
Ferziger
J. H.
,
1988
, “
A Note on Numerical Accuracy
,”
Special Note, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
, Vol.
8
, pp.
995
–
996
.
16.
Ferziger, J. H., 1993, “Estimation and Reduction of Numerical Error,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics, I. Celik, C. J. Chen, P. J. Roache, G. Sheuerer, eds., ASME Fluids Engineering Division Spring Meeting, Washington DC. June 20-24, pp. 1–8.
17.
Freitas
C. J.
,
1993
, “
JFE Editorial Policy statement on the Control of Numerical Accuracy
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
115
, pp.
339
–
340
.
18.
Gossman, A. D., and Pun, W. M., 1973, TEACH: Lecture Notes for the Course entitled “Calculation of Recirculating Flows,” Imperial College, London.
19.
Kessler, R., Peric, M., and Scheuerer, G., 1988, “Solution Error Estimation in the Numerical Predictions for Turbulent Recirculating Flows,” NATO AGARD Conference Proc. No. 437 on Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Lizbon, Portugal.
20.
Lewins, J., and Becker, M., 1982, Eds., “Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Reactor Performance Parameters,” Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 14, Plenum Press, New York.
21.
Ludwig, J. C., Qin, H. Q., and Spalding, D. B., 1989, The PHOENICS Reference Manual, Cham TR/200, CHAM Limited, Bakery House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London SW19 5AU, England.
22.
Mehta
U. B.
,
1991
, “
Some Aspects of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics Results
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
113
, pp.
538
–
543
.
23.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)—Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), Proceedings of the Conference on Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Proc. No. 437, Lisbon, Portugal, 1988.
24.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, NY.
25.
Patankar, S. V., 1988, “Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations,” presented at the Panel Discussion on “Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, III., Nov. 30-Dec. 2.
26.
Richardson
L. F.
,
1910
, “
The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, with an Application to the Stresses In a Masonary Dam
,”
Transactions of the Royal Society of London
, Ser. A, Vol.
210
, pp.
307
–
357
.
27.
Roache, P. J., 1972, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, NM.
28.
Roache
P. J.
,
1990
, “
Need for Control of Numerical Accuracy
,”
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
, Vol.
27
, No.
2
, Mar.-Apr., pp.
98
–
102
.
29.
Roache
P. J.
,
Ghia
K. N.
, and
White
F. M.
,
1986
, “
Editorial Policy Statement on the Control of Numerical Accuracy
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
108
, p.
2
2
.
30.
Ronen, Y., 1988, Uncertainty Analysis, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL.
31.
Rodi, W., 1980, Turbulence Models and Their Application in Hydraulics, Book Publication of Int. Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, The Netherlands.
32.
Ronen, Y., 1988, Ed., Uncertainty Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.