Stratified gas–liquid flow is a flow regime typically encountered in multiphase pipelines. The understanding and modeling of this regime is of engineering importance especially for the oil and gas industry. In this work, simulations have been conducted for stratified air–water flow in pipes. We solved the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the volume of fluid (VOF) method. The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of the k–ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model with and without damping of the turbulence at the gas–liquid interface. Simulation results were compared with some of the latest experimental results found in the literature. A comparison between the simulated velocity and kinetic energy profiles and the experimental results obtained with the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique was conducted. The characteristics of the interfacial waves were also extracted and compared with the experiments. It is shown that a proper damping of the turbulence close to the interface is needed to obtain agreement with the experimental pressure drop and liquid hold-up. In its current form, however, RANS with the k–ω turbulence model is still not able to give an accurate prediction of the velocity profiles and of the interface waves.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article
Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Experiments for Stratified Air-Water Flows in Pipes
Gabriele Chinello,
Gabriele Chinello
Department of Engineering,
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40BA, UK
e-mail: gabriele.chinello@gcu.ac.uk
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40BA, UK
e-mail: gabriele.chinello@gcu.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Don McGlinchey,
Don McGlinchey
Department of Engineering,
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40B, UK
e-mail: D.McGlinchey@gcu.ac.uk
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40B, UK
e-mail: D.McGlinchey@gcu.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Gijsbert Ooms,
Gijsbert Ooms
Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics,
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Ooms@tudelft.nl
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Ooms@tudelft.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
Ruud Henkes
Ruud Henkes
Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics,
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
Shell Projects & Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: R.A.W.M.Henkes@tudelft.nl
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
Shell Projects & Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: R.A.W.M.Henkes@tudelft.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
Gabriele Chinello
Department of Engineering,
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40BA, UK
e-mail: gabriele.chinello@gcu.ac.uk
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40BA, UK
e-mail: gabriele.chinello@gcu.ac.uk
Anis Awal Ayati
Don McGlinchey
Department of Engineering,
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40B, UK
e-mail: D.McGlinchey@gcu.ac.uk
Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glasgow G40B, UK
e-mail: D.McGlinchey@gcu.ac.uk
Gijsbert Ooms
Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics,
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Ooms@tudelft.nl
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Ooms@tudelft.nl
Ruud Henkes
Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics,
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
Shell Projects & Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: R.A.W.M.Henkes@tudelft.nl
Process and Energy Department,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
Shell Projects & Technology,
Delft 2628 CA, The Netherlands
e-mail: R.A.W.M.Henkes@tudelft.nl
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 13, 2018; final manuscript received September 26, 2018; published online November 16, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Kwang-Yong Kim.
J. Fluids Eng. May 2019, 141(5): 051302 (12 pages)
Published Online: November 16, 2018
Article history
Received:
June 13, 2018
Revised:
September 26, 2018
Citation
Chinello, G., Ayati, A. A., McGlinchey, D., Ooms, G., and Henkes, R. (November 16, 2018). "Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Experiments for Stratified Air-Water Flows in Pipes." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. May 2019; 141(5): 051302. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041667
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Flow Control Around a Cylinder With a Perforated Cylinder
J. Fluids Eng (July 2023)
Experimental Study of The Pressure-Time Method With Potential Application for Low-Head Hydropower
J. Fluids Eng (July 2023)
Related Articles
Drag Reduction Due to Streamwise Grooves in Turbulent Channel Flow
J. Fluids Eng (December,2016)
Frictional Performance of U-Type Wavy Tubes
J. Fluids Eng (September,2003)
Computational Fluid Dynamics Application of the Diffusion-Inertia Model to Bubble Flows and Boiling Water Problems
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2010)
Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Basics of Hydraulic Loops
Hydraulics, Pipe Flow, Industrial HVAC & Utility Systems: Mister Mech Mentor, Vol. 1
Extended-Surface Metallurgy
Heat Exchanger Engineering Techniques
Adding Surface While Minimizing Downtime
Heat Exchanger Engineering Techniques