The effect of a gap between an inlet duct and a rotating impeller in a centrifugal fan is often neglected in the impeller design calculations or design-related computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses. This leads to an arbitrary determination of the gap size for the final fan configuration. Since the gap guides the volute flow back to the impeller flow field near the shroud high-curvature turning area, the low-momentum jet formed by the gap flow could prevent local flow from separation, reducing the local flow turning losses. However, this jet flow has enlarged flow separation in the blade passage, producing shedding vorticity in the downstream passage-flow. The passage-flow separation and the downstream volute flow, which is also affected by the passage-flow separation, have a higher impact on flow losses than the blade leading edge separation. If the gap size is not selected carefully, the combined effect of the passage-flow separation and downstream volute flow losses reduces the fan’s overall performance between 2% points and 5% points as demonstrated in the current study. In this paper, local impeller velocity distributions obtained from both design-CFD and analysis-CFD calculations are compared along the shroud from the gap to the blade trailing edge. The overall impeller flow fields with and without the gap and volute effects are also compared and discussed based on the CFD solutions. Finally, an example of controlling the gap effect is shown.

1.
Expeditionary Platforms Branch
, 2008, “
LCE Bellmouth Performance Test Report
,” Naval Surface Warfare Center Report No. 32407.
2.
Hosangadi
,
A.
,
Lee
,
R. A.
,
York
,
B. J.
,
Sinha
,
N.
, and
Dash
,
S. M.
, 1996, “
Upwind Unstructured Scheme for Three-Dimensional Combusting Flows
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
12
(
3
), pp.
494
502
.
3.
Hosangadi
,
A.
,
Lee
,
R. A.
,
Cavallo
,
P. A.
,
Sinha
,
N.
, and
York
,
B. J.
, 1998, “
Hybrid, Viscous, Unstructured Mesh Solver for Propulsive Applications
,”
AIAA 34th JPC
, Cleveland, OH, Paper No. AIAA-98-3153.
4.
Lee
,
Y. T.
,
Mulvihill
,
L.
,
Coleman
,
R.
,
Ahuja
,
V.
,
Hosangadi
,
A.
,
Birkbeck
,
R.
,
Becnel
,
A.
, and
Slipper
,
M.
, 2007, “
LCAC Lift Fan Redesign and CFD Evaluation
,” Naval Surface Warfare Center Report No. NSWCCD-50-TR-2007/031.
5.
Slipper
,
M. E.
,
McGinnis
,
P. J.
,
Choi
,
G.
,
Tucker
,
W. L.
,
Quigley
,
J. M.
,
Lee
,
Y. T.
, and
Mulvihill
,
L. P.
, 2008, “
Design and Evaluation of High Performance Lift Fan Models for the Landing Craft, Air Cushion (LCAC)
,” Naval Surface Warfare Center Draft Report No. NSWCCD-98-TR-2008.
6.
Barth
,
T. J.
, 1991, “
A 3D Upwind Euler Solver for Unstructured Meshes
,” Paper No. AIAA-91-1548.
7.
Barth
,
T. J.
, and
Linton
,
S. W.
, 1995, “
An Unstructured Mesh Newton Solution for Compressible Fluid Flow and Its Parallel Implementation
,” Paper No. AIAA-95-0221.
8.
Phelan
,
J. J.
,
Russel
,
S. H.
, and
Zeluff
,
W. C.
, 1978, “
A Study of the Influence of Reynolds Number on the Performance of Centrifugal Fans
,” ASME Paper No. 78-WA/PTC-1.
You do not currently have access to this content.