A model for predicting sand erosion in 90 degree elbows and bends has been developed based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particle tracking and erosion data. After the flow field was obtained from the flow (CFD) model, particles were introduced into the flow and particle trajectories were computed using a Lagrangian approach. A model was also implemented that accounts for the interaction between the particles and the target material. Based on predicted particle impingement velocities, erosion rates and penetration rates were predicted using the empirical equations for erosion ratio. The predicted penetration rates are compared with available experimental data for several different elbows. The agreement between the predicted penetration rates and the experimental data is good. In addition, based on many predictions and erosion rate results, a new CFD based correlation is developed that can be used for an approximate engineering calculation to account for effects of elbow radius on erosion in long-radius elbows. This equation is for computing the ratio of the wall thickness loss (or the penetration rate) in a long-radius elbow to the penetration rate of a standard (short-radius) elbow. The results from the correlation agree well with the trend of available data in the literature.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
oil technology, pipe flow, sand, erosion, fluid dynamics, flow simulation
Topics:
Erosion, Flow (Dynamics), Particulate matter, Sands, Fluids, Computational fluid dynamics
1.
Venkatesh, E. S., 1986, “Erosion Damage in Oil and Gas Wells,” SPE Paper 15183.
2.
Mills, D., and Manson, J. S., 1975, “Learning to Live With Erosion of Bends,” First International Conference on the Inter and External Protection of Pipes, Paper G1.
3.
Bikbiaev
,
F. A.
,
Maksimenko
,
M. I.
,
Berezin
,
V. L.
,
Krasnov
,
V. L.
, and
Zhilinskii
,
I. B.
, 1972, “Wear on Branches in Pneumatic Conveying Ducting,” Chemical Petroleum Engineering, 8, pp. 465–466.
4.
Bikbiaev
,
K. A.
,
Krasnov
,
V. I.
,
Maksimenko
,
M. I.
,
Berezin
,
V. L.
,
Zhilinskii
,
I. B.
, and
Otroshko
,
N. T.
, 1973, “Main Factors Affecting Gas Abrasive Wear of Elbows in Pneumatic Conveying Pipes,” Chemical Petroleum Engineering, 9, pp. 73–75.
5.
Flemmer, C. L., Flemmer, R. L. C., Means, K., and Johnson, E. K., 1988, “The Erosion of Pipe Bends,” The 1988 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, pp. 93–98.
6.
Bourgoyne Jr., A. T., 1989, “Experimental Study of Erosion in Diverter Systems due to Sand Production,” SPE/IADC 18716.
7.
Tolle, G. C., and Greenwood, D. R., 1977, “Design of Pipe Fittings to Reduce Wear Caused by Sand Erosion,” API OSAPER Project No. 6, Texas A&M Research Foundation.
8.
Eyler, R. L., 1987, “Design and Analysis of a Pneumatic Flow Loop,” M.S. thesis, West Virginia University.
9.
Ahlert, K. R., 1994, “Effects of Particle Impingement Angle and Surface Wetting on Solid Particle Erosion on ANSI 1018 Steel,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa.
10.
Warsi, Z. U. A., 1992, “Fluid Dynamics Theoretical and Computational Approaches,” CRC Press.
11.
Wang
,
J.
, and
Shirazi
,
S. A.
,
2000
, “
A Simultaneous Variable Solution Procedure for Laminar and Turbulent Flows in Curved Channels and Bends
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
552
–
559
.
12.
Kim., Wu. J., and Patel, V. C., 1993, “An Experimental Study of Boundary-Later Flow in A Curved Rectangular Duct,” Data for Validation of CFD codes, (and ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering Data Bank), FED-Vol. 146, pp. 13–28.
13.
Clark
,
H. McI.
, and
Burmeister
,
L. C.
,
1992
, “
The Influence of the Squeeze Film on Particle Impact Velocities in Erosion
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
12
(
3
), pp.
415
–
426
.
14.
Brand, L., 1947, “Vector and Tensor Analysis,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 359–360.
15.
Grant
,
G.
, and
Tabakoff
,
W.
,
1975
, “
Erosion Prediction in Turbomachinary Resulting From Environmental Solid Particles
,”
J. Aircr.
,
12
(
5
), pp.
471
–
478
.
16.
Jun, Y-D., and Tabakoff, W., 1992, “Numerical Simulation of a Dilute Particulate Flow over Tube Banks,” Multiphase Flow in Wells and Pipelines, Winter Annual Meeting of ASME, Anaheim, CA, pp. 125–133.
17.
Mclaughlin, M., 1968, “Experimental Study of Particle Wall Collisions Relating to Flow of Solid Particles in A Fluid,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, CA.
18.
Bentson, J., and Vradis, G., 1987, “A Two-stage Pressure Correction Technique for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA Paper No. 87-0545, AIAA 25th Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 12–15.
19.
Sotiropoulos, F., and Patel, V. C., 1992, “Flow in Curved Ducts of Varying Cross-Section,” IIHR Report No. 358, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa.
20.
Oroskar
,
A. R.
, and
Turian
,
R. M.
,
1980
, “
The Critical Velocity in Pipeline Flow of Slurries
,”
AIChE J.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
550
–
558
.
21.
Shirazi
,
S. A.
,
Shadley
,
J. R.
,
Mclaury
,
B. S.
, and
Rybicki
,
E. F.
,
1995
, “
A Procedure to Predict Solid Particle Erosion in Elbows and Tees
,”
J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
117
, pp.
45
–
52
.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.