Not enough attention has been devoted to developing the manufacturing processes required to transition fuel cell science into commercially viable products, despite clear recognition that cost and reliability are two key factors preventing more rapid introduction of the technology. Understandably, there is a natural reluctance of many companies to invest resources in manufacturing processes and systems for a product that is still evolving. Changes in materials, geometries, and even the basic fuel cell architecture can have profound effects on the viability of certain manufacturing processes and equipment. This situation suggests that modular flexible manufacturing processes be adopted to accommodate these uncertainties. Since 1999 researchers in the Center for Automation Technologies and Systems (CATS) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have focused on developing flexible manufacturing processes and systems for the manufacture of high temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell components. One result has been a fully automated membrane and electrode assembly (MEA) pilot manufacturing line developed for BASF Fuel Cell, GmbH, formerly Pemeas, GmbH that has been operating since September of 2002. This pilot line has been designed as a highly flexible modular manufacturing system that is able to respond quickly and cost effectively to changes in product materials, geometries, and architectures. For example, the line has easily accommodated three generations of membrane materials and a broad range of MEA sizes and geometries. Because of this flexibility, short runs of prototype MEAs are feasible, and the pilot line is able to produce a high mix of a broad range of MEA sizes. The CATS research team continues to optimize manufacturing processes to provide increased capacity, consistency, reduced costs, and high product quality. This paper will describe the many challenges and risks associated with the development and implementation of an advanced manufacturing capability for high temperature PEM MEAs, and the continuing collaboration between the BASF Fuel Cell and the CATS. Specific examples of several technical challenges and the adopted solutions are presented, along with ongoing fuel cell manufacturing initiatives.

1.
Department of Energy
, 2003, “
Research and Development for Fuel Cells for Stationary and Automotive Applications
,” DOE Solicitation No. DE-SC02-03CH11137.
2.
Department of Energy
, 2002, “
A National Vision of America’s Transition to a Hydrogen Economy: To 2030 and Beyond
,” Feb., U.S. Department of Energy.
3.
Department of Energy
, 2005, “
Manufacturing for the Hydrogen Economy: Manufacturing Research and Development of PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation Application
,”
Background Material for the Manufacturing R&D Workshop
, Washington, DC, Jul. 13–14, 2005,
Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
,
Washington, DC
, available at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/mfg_wkshp_fuelcell.pdf.
5.
Display Search
, 2006, “
Quarterly Notebook PC Shipments and Forecast Report
,” Aug. 28, 2006, see http://www.displaysearch.com/products/?pn=qnbhttp://www.displaysearch.com/products/?pn=qnb.
6.
Mehta
,
V.
, and
Cooper
,
J.
, 2003, “
Review and Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Design and Manufacturing
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
114
, pp.
32
53
.
7.
Sansone
,
M. J.
, 2001, “
Process for Producing Polymeric Films for Use as Fuel Cells
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,187,231.
12.
Puffer
,
R.
, and
Hoppes
,
G.
, 2004, “
Development of a Flexible Pilot High Temperature MEA Manufacturing Line
,”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
,
ASME
,
New York
.
14.
Harris
,
T. A.
, and
Walczyk
,
D. F.
, 2006, “
Development of a Casting Technique for Membrane Material Used in High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
1526-6125,
8
(
1
), pp.
19
31
.
15.
Morrison
,
F.
, 2001,
Understanding Rheology
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
, pp.
231
232
.
You do not currently have access to this content.