The circle criterion provides a sufficient condition for global asymptotic stability for a specific class of nonlinear systems, those consisting of the feedback interconnection of a single-input, single-output linear dynamic system and a static, sector-hounded nonlinearity. Previous authors (Wang et al, 1990) have noted the similarity between the graphical circle criterion and design bounds in the complex plane stemming from the Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT) design methodology. The QFT formulation has specific advantages from the standpoint of controller synthesis. However, the aforementioned approach requires that plant uncertainty sets (i.e., “templates”) be manipulated in the complex plane. Recently, a modified formulation for the QFT linear robust performance and robust stability problem has been put forward in terms of sensitivity function bounds. This formulation admits a parametric inequality which is quadratic in the open loop transfer function magnitude, resulting in a computational simplification over the template-based approach. In addition, the methodology admits mixed parametric and nonparametric plant models. The disk inequality which results represents a much closer analog of the circle criterion, requiring only scaling and a real axis shift. This observation is developed in this paper, and the methodology is demonstrated in this paper via feedback design and parametric analysis of a quarter-car active suspension model with a sector nonlinearity.

1.
Chapellat
H.
,
Dahleh
M.
, and
Bhattacharyya
S. P.
,
1991
, “
On Robust Nonlinear Stability of Interval Control Systems
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
36
, pp.
59
67
.
2.
Chait
Y.
,
Borghesani
C.
, and
Zheng
Y.
,
1995
, “
Single-loop QFT Design for Robust Performance in the Presence of Non-Parametric Uncertainties
,”
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
117
, pp.
420
425
.
3.
Haddad
W. M.
, and
Kapila
V.
,
1995
, “
Absolute Stability Criteria for Multiple Slope-Restricted Monotonic Nonlinearities
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
40
, pp.
361
365
.
4.
Horowitz
I. M.
,
1975
, “
A Synthesis Theory for Nonlinear Time-Varying Feedback Systems with Plant Uncertainty
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
AC-20
, pp.
454
463
.
5.
Horowitz
I. M.
,
1982
, “
Feedback Systems with Nonlinear Uncertain Plants
,”
International Journal of Control
, Vol.
36
, pp.
155
171
.
6.
Horowitz
I. M.
, and
Sidi
M.
,
1972
, “
Synthesis of Feedback Systems with Large Plant Ignorance for Prescribed Time Domain Tolerance
,”
International Journal of Control
, Vol.
16
, pp.
287
309
.
7.
Horowitz
I. M.
, and
Sidi
M.
,
1978
, “
Optimum Synthesis of Nonminimum-Phase Feedback Systems with Parameter Uncertainty
,”
International Journal of Control
, Vol.
27
, pp.
361
386
.
8.
Hyland
D. C.
,
Collins
E. G.
, and
Haddad
W. M.
,
1996
, “
Frequency Domain Performance Bounds for Uncertain Positive Real Systems
,”
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
19
, pp.
398
406
.
9.
Jayasuriya
S.
, and
Zhao
Y.
,
1994
, “
Robust Stability of Plants with Mixed Uncertainties and Quantitative Feedback Theory
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL
, Vol.
116
. pp.
10
16
.
10.
Jayasuriya
S.
, and
Zhao
Y.
,
1994
, “
Stability of Quantitative Feedback Designs and the Existence of Robust QFT Controllers
,”
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
, Vol.
4
, pp.
21
46
.
11.
Khalil, H. K., 1996, Nonlinear Systems, Second Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12.
Nordgrcn
R. E.
,
Nwokah
O. D. I.
, and
Franchek
M. A.
,
1994
, “
New Formulations for Quantitative Feedback Theory
,”
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
, Vol.
4
, pp.
47
64
.
13.
Ulsoy
A. G.
,
Hrovat
D.
, and
Tseng
T.
,
1994
, “
Stability Robustness of LQ and LQG Active Suspensions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
116
, pp.
123
31
.
14.
Vidyasagar, M., 1978, Nonlinear Systems Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Wang
T.-S.
,
Hwang
Y.-C.
, and
Tsai
T.-P.
,
1990
, “
Synthesis of Feedback Control Systems with Large Plant Uncertainty and Time-Varying Gain
,”
International Journal of Control
, Vol.
51
, pp.
687
704
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.