Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely applied in evaluating multicriteria decision making problems, which have multi-input and multi-output. However, the traditional DEA method does neither take the decision maker’s subjective preferences to the individual criteria into consideration nor rank the selected options or decision making units (DMUs). On the other hand, Satty’s analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was established to rank options or DMUs under multi-input and multi-output through pairwise comparisons. However, in most cases, the AHP pairwise comparison method is not perfectly consistent, which may give rise to confusions in determining the appropriate priorities of each criterion to be considered. The inconsistency implicates the fuzziness in generating the relative important weight for each criterion. In this paper, a novel method, which employs both DEA and AHP methods, is proposed to evaluate the overall performance of suppliers’ involvement in the production of a manufacturing company. This method has been developed through modifying the DEA method into a weighting constrained DEA method by using a piecewise triangular weighting fuzzy set, which is generated from the inconsistent AHP comparisons. A bias tolerance ratio (BTR) is introduced to represent the varying but restrained weighting values of each criterion. Accordingly, the BTR provides the decision maker a controllable parameter by tightening or loosening the range of the weighting values in evaluating the overall performance of available suppliers, which in hence, overcomes the two weaknesses of the traditional DEA method.

1.
Charnes
,
A.
,
Cooper
,
W. W.
, and
Rhodes
,
E.
, 1978, “
Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
2
(
6
), pp.
429
444
.
2.
Talluri
,
S.
, and
Yoon
,
K. P.
, 2000, “
A Cone-Ratio DEA Approach for AMT Justification
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
0925-5273,
66
, pp.
119
129
.
3.
Zhang
,
S.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Tong
,
J.
,
Zhou
,
J.
, and
Ruan
,
L.
, 2006, “
Evaluation of Project Quality: a DEA-Based Approach
,” SPW/ProSim 2006, LNCS 3966, pp.
88
96
.
4.
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
, 2006, “
A DEA Model With an AHP Restraint cone
,”
Journal of Systems Science & Information
(the English version of a Chinese journal),
9
(
4
), pp.
749
758
.
5.
Charnes
,
A.
,
Cooper
,
W. W.
,
Huang
,
Z. M.
, and
Sun
,
D. B.
, 1990, “
Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models With an Illustrative Application to Large Commercial Banks
,”
J. Econometr.
0304-4076,
40
, pp.
73
91
.
6.
Zhang
,
T.
, 2003, “
An Application of a Preference Restraint Cone DEA Model in Vendor Selection
,”
System Engineering and Practice
(Chinese),
3
, pp.
77
81
.
7.
Asmild
,
M.
, and
Paradi
,
J. C.
, 2007, “
Measuring Overall Efficiency and Effectiveness Using DEA
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
178
, pp.
305
321
.
8.
Saaty
,
T. L.
, 1980,
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
9.
Boender
,
C. G.
,
de Graan
,
J. G.
, and
Lootsma
,
F.
, 1989, “
Multicriteria Decision Analysis With Fuzzy Pairwise Comparisons
,”
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
0165-0114,
29
, pp.
133
143
.
10.
Chen
,
S. J.
,
Hwang
,
C.
,
Beckmann
,
M.
, and
Krelle
,
W.
, 1992,
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
11.
Sugihara
,
K.
, 2001, “
Interval Evaluations in the Analytic Hierarchy Process by Possibility Analysis
,”
Comput. Intelligence
0824-7935,
17
(
3
), pp.
567
579
.
12.
Sugihara
,
K.
, and
Ishi
,
H.
, 2001, “
Fuzzy AHP With Incomplete Information
,”
IFSA/NAFIPS 2001 IEEE
, pp.
2730
2733
.
13.
Millet
,
I.
, and
Harker
,
P.
, 1990, “
Globally Effective Questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
48
(
1
), pp.
88
97
.
14.
Cooper
,
W. W.
,
Ruiz
,
J. L.
, and
Sirvent
,
I.
, 2007, “
Choosing Weights From Alternative Optimal Solutions of Dual Multiplier Models in DEA
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
180
, pp.
443
458
.
15.
Charnes
,
A.
, and
Cooper
,
W. W.
, 1962, “
Programming With Linear Fractional Functionals
,”
Naval Res. Logistics Quart.
0894-069X,
9
, pp.
181
186
.
16.
Akarte
,
M.
,
Surendra
,
N.
,
Ravi
,
B.
, and
Rangaraj
,
N.
, 2001, “
Web Based Casting Supplier Evaluation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process
,”
J. Oper. Res. Soc.
0160-5682,
52
, pp.
511
522
.
17.
Cook
,
W. D.
,
Kress
,
M.
, and
Seiford
,
L. M.
, 1992, “
Prioritization Models for Frontier Decision Making Units in DEA
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
59
, pp.
319
323
.
18.
Hwang
,
H. S.
,
Chuang
,
C. L.
, and
Goan
,
M. J.
, 2005, “
Supplier Selection and Planning Model Using AHP
,”
International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management
(Chinese),
1
(
1
), pp.
47
53
.
19.
Jiao
,
J.
, and
Tseng
,
M.
, 1998, “
Fuzzy Ranking for Concept Evaluation in Configuration Design for Mass Customization
,”
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl.
1063-293X,
6
(
3
), pp.
189
206
.
20.
Sinuany-Stern
,
Z.
, and
Mehrez
,
A.
, and
Hadad
,
Y.
, 2000, “
An AHP/DEA Methodology for Ranking Decision Making Units
,”
Int. Trans. Oper. Res.
0969-6016,
7
, pp.
109
124
.
You do not currently have access to this content.