When this new association process of a datum is performed to verify a geometrical specification, measured points are considered as perturbations which generate modifications of the nominal geometry by variation of its location, orientation, and intrinsic dimensional characteristics, without requiring rotation and translation variables as the traditional methods usually do (Bourdet, et al., 1996, Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology II, World Scientific) with torsors or matrices. This new association process (Choley, 2005, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Central, Paris; Choley, et al., 2006, Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology, VII, World Scientific) is based on both a reduced modeling of the geometry, taken out of the computer aided design system database, and a variational distance function. The whole measured points set influence is taken into account as an optimization criterion is applied (Bourdet and Clement, 1988, Ann. CIRP 37(1), p. 503; Srinivasan, DIMACS Workshop on Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing, Rutgers University, NJ, October 7–9). Thus, the least squares optimization is achieved using the pseudo-inverse matrix, whereas the minimax optimization is treated with an algorithm developed by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt and adapted for this purpose. In this paper, it is explained how this association process may be applied to planes and cylinders, used as single datum, datum systems, or common datum, with the least squares and minimax criteria.

1.
Bourdet
,
P.
,
Mathieu
,
L.
,
Lartigue
,
C.
, and
Ballu
,
A.
, 1996, “
The Concept of the Small Displacement Torsor in Metrology
,”
Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology II
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
2.
Choley
,
J.-Y.
, 2005, “
Une Approche Variationnelle de l’Association des Références en Tolérancement Géométrique
,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, Paris.
3.
Choley
,
J.-Y.
,
Riviere
,
A.
,
Clement
,
A.
, and
Bourdet
,
P.
, 2006, “
A New Approach to Datums Association for the Verification of the Geometrical Specifications
,”
Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology VII
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
4.
Bourdet
,
P.
, and
Clement
,
A.
, 1988, “
A Study of Optimal-Criteria Identification Based on the Small-Displacement Screw Model
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506
37
(
1
), p.
503
.
5.
Srinivasan
,
V.
, 2003, “
Elements of Computational Metrology
,”
Proceedings DIMACS Workshop on Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing
,
Rutgers University
, NJ, October 7–9.
6.
Cox
,
M. G.
,
Drieschner
,
R.
, and
Kok
,
J.
, 1993, “
Chebyshev Reference Software for the Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machine Data
,” Rep. No. EUR 15304 EN, Commission of the European Communities.
7.
Sourlier
,
D.
, and
Gander
,
W.
, 1996, “
A New Method and Software-Tool for the Exact Solution of Complex Dimensional Measurement Problems
,”
Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology II
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
8.
Clement
,
A.
,
Vallade
,
C.
, and
Riviere
,
A.
, 1997, “
The TTRSs: 13 Oriented Constraints for Dimensioning, Tolerancing & Inspection
,”
Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology III
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
9.
Ballu
,
A.
,
Dantan
,
J.-Y.
, and
Mathieu
,
L.
, 2001, “
Global View of Geometrical Specifications
,”
Proceedings 7th CIRP International Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing
, ENS Cachan, France, April.
You do not currently have access to this content.