This paper presents a comparative study on the size optimization of four mesostructures to meet the design requirements for a nonpneumatic tire's (NPT) shear beam with 10% shear flexure (SF) at 10 MPa effective shear modulus. The need for such comparison is motivated from the previous research wherein a systematic design method is proposed to design a mesostructure with high SF by studying the strain energy distribution pattern in honeycomb, auxetic, and sinusoidal auxetic mesostructure. Based upon the distribution pattern, a new type of mesostructure termed S-type is invented. Although it exhibited higher SF than the other mesostructures for a comparable set of geometry, it is not possible to validate the design method without exploring the complete design space of both existing and newly invented mesostructures. In order to address this limitation, these four mesostructures are optimized using the following optimization algorithms: (i) particle swarm; (ii) genetic algorithm (GA); and (iii) FAST–SIMPLEX (using response surface method). The results show the S-type mesostructure can be configured to meet the design requirements, thereby validating the design method presented in previous research. Additionally, it is also observed that auxetic mesostructure is only 5% less than the required design target, which presents an opportunity in future, to develop an alternate design method to maximize SF other than the one that is being validated in this paper.

References

1.
Thyagaraja
,
N.
,
Shankar
,
P.
,
Fadel
,
G. M.
, and
Guarneri
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Optimizing the Shear Beam of a Non-Pneumatic Wheel for Low Rolling Resistance
,”
ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
ASME
Paper No. DETC2011-48532.
2.
Shankar
,
P.
,
Fazelpour
,
M.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2013
, “
An Energy-Based Approach for Design of Meso-Structures With High Shear Flexure
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-12292.
3.
Barrand
,
J.
, and
Bokar
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Reducing Tire Rolling Resistance to Save Fuel and Lower Emissions
,”
SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars—Mech. Syst.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
9
17
.
4.
Anonymous
,
2006
, “
Tires and Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy—Transportation Research Board
,” Special Report No. 286.
5.
Ju
,
J.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2011
, “
Compliant Hexagonal Periodic Lattice Structures Having Both High Shear Strength and High Shear Strain
,”
Mater. Des.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
512
524
.
6.
Fazelpour
,
M.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2014
, “
Evolution of Meso-Structures for Non-Pneumatic Tire Development: A Case Study
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2014-34184.
7.
Shankar
,
P.
,
Ju
,
J.
,
Summers
,
J. D.
, and
Ziegert
,
J. C.
,
2010
, “
Design of Sinusoidal Auxetic Structures for High Shear Flexure
,”
ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
ASME
Paper No. DETC2010-28545.
8.
Rhyne
,
T. B.
, and
Cron
,
S. M.
,
2006
, “
Development of a Non-Pneumatic Wheel
,”
Tire Sci. Technol.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
150
169
.
9.
Zarei
,
H.
, and
Kröger
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Optimum Honeycomb Filled Crash Absorber Design
,”
Mater. Des.
,
29
(
1
), pp.
193
204
.
10.
Berglind
,
L. A.
,
Ju
,
J.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2012
, “
Aluminum Taper Bristle-Shaped Shear Band for a Non-Pneumatic Tire
,”
Tire Sci. Technol.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
152
170
.
11.
Chang
,
P.
, and
Rosen
,
D.
,
2013
, “
The Size Matching and Scaling Method: A Synthesis Method for the Design of Mesoscale Cellular Structures
,”
Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
,
26
(
10
), pp.
907
927
.
12.
Rosen
,
D.
,
Johnston
,
S.
, and
Reed
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Design of General Lattice Structures for Lightweight and Compliance Applications
,”
Rapid Manufacturing Conference
, Loughborough, UK, pp.
1
14
.
13.
Rigoni
,
E.
,
2010
, “
Fast Optimizers: General Description
,” ESTECO, Technical Report No. 2010-004.
14.
Kennedy
,
J.
, and
Eberhart
,
R.
,
1995
, “
Particle Swarm Optimization
,”
IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks
, IEEE, Perth, WA, pp.
1942
1948
.
You do not currently have access to this content.