Synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is associated with high complication rates. While current devices incorporate large pores (>1 mm), recent studies have shown that uniaxial loading of mesh reduces pore size, raising the risk for complications. However, it is difficult to translate uniaxial results to transvaginal meshes, as in vivo loading is multidirectional. Thus, the aim of this study was to (1) experimentally characterize deformation of pore diameters in a transvaginal mesh in response to clinically relevant multidirectional loading and (2) develop a computational model to simulate mesh behavior in response to in vivo loading conditions. Tension (2.5 N) was applied to each of mesh arm to simulate surgical implantation. Two loading conditions were assessed where the angle of the applied tension was altered and image analysis was used to quantify changes in pore dimensions. A computational model was developed and used to simulate pore behavior in response to these same loading conditions and the results were compared to experimental findings. For both conditions, between 26.4% and 56.6% of all pores were found to have diameters <1 mm. Significant reductions in pore diameter were noted in the inferior arms and between the two superior arms. The computational model identified the same regions, though the model generally underestimated pore deformation. This study demonstrates that multiaxial loading applied clinically has the potential to locally reduce porosity in transvaginal mesh, increasing the risk for complications. Computational simulations show potential of predicting this behavior for more complex loading conditions.

References

1.
Schultz, D. G., 2008, “
Serious Complications Associated With Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence
,” FDA Public Health Notification, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
2.
Chen
,
C. C.
,
Ridgeway
,
B.
, and
Paraiso
,
M. F.
,
2007
, “
Biologic Grafts and Synthetic Meshes in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
,”
Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.
,
50
(
2
), pp.
382
441
.
3.
Baessler
,
K.
,
Hewson
,
A. D.
,
Schuessler
,
B.
, and
Maher
,
C. F.
,
2005
, “
Severe Mesh Complications Following Intravaginal Slingpasty
,”
Obstet. Gynecol.
,
106
(
4
), pp.
713
716
.
4.
Krause
,
H.
,
Bennett
,
M.
,
Forwood
,
M.
, and
Goh
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Biomechanical Properties of Raw Meshes Used in Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
,”
Int. Urogynecology J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
,
19
(
12
), pp.
1677
1681
.
5.
Shepherd
,
J. P.
,
Feola
,
A. J.
,
Abramowitch
,
S. D.
, and
Moalli
,
P. A.
,
2012
, “
Uniaxial Biomechanical Properties of Seven Different Vaginally Implanted Meshes for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
,”
Int. Urogynecology J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
613
620
.
6.
Cosson
,
M.
,
Debodinance
,
P.
,
Boukerrou
,
M.
,
Chauvet
,
M. P.
,
Lobry
,
P.
,
Crépin
,
G.
, and
Ego
,
A.
,
2003
, “
Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Implants Used in the Repair of Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence in Women: Which Is the Ideal Material?
,”
Int. Urogynecology J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
169
178
.
7.
Greca
,
F. H.
,
De Paula
,
J. B.
,
Biondo-Simões
,
M. L. P.
,
Da Costa
,
F. D.
,
Da Silva
,
A. P. G.
,
Time
,
S.
, and
Mansur
,
A.
,
2001
, “
The Influence of Differing Pore Sizes on the Biocompatibility of Two Polypropylene Meshes in the Repair of Abdominal Defects: Experimental Study in Dogs
,”
Hernia
,
5
(
2
), pp.
59
64
.
8.
Greca
,
F. H.
,
Souza-Filho
,
Z. A.
,
Giovanini
,
A.
,
Rubin
,
M. R.
,
Kuenzer
,
R. F.
,
Reese
,
F. B.
, and
Araujo
,
L. M.
,
2008
, “
The Influence of Porosity on the Integration Histology of Two Polypropylene Meshes for the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Defects in Dogs
,”
Hernia
,
12
(
1
), pp.
45
49
.
9.
Klinge
,
U. K. B.
,
2011
, “
Modified Classification of Surgical Meshes for Hernia Repair Based on the Analysis of 1000 Explanted Meshes
,”
Hernia
,
16
(
3
), pp.
251
258
.
10.
Pierce
,
L. M.
,
Rao
,
A.
,
Baumann
,
S. S.
,
Glassberg
,
J. E.
,
Kuehl
,
T. J.
, and
Muir
,
T. W.
,
2009
, “
Long-Term Histologic Response to Synthetic and Biologic Graft Materials Implanted in the Vagina and Abdomen of a Rabbit Model
,”
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
,
200
(
5
), p.
546
.
11.
Barone
,
W. R.
,
Moalli
,
P. A.
, and
Abramowitch
,
S. D.
,
2016
, “
Textile Properties of Synthetic Prolapse Mesh in Response to Uniaxial Loading
,”
AJOG
,
215
(
3
), p.
326
.
12.
Liang
,
R.
,
Abramowitch
,
S.
,
Knight
,
K.
,
Palcsey
,
S.
,
Nolfi
,
A.
,
Feola
,
A.
, Stein, S., and Moalli, P.A.,
2013
, “
Vaginal Degeneration Following Implantation of Synthetic Mesh With Increased Stiffness
,”
BJOG
,
120
(
2
), pp.
233
243
.
13.
Feiner
,
B.
, and
Maher
,
C.
,
2010
, “
Vaginal Mesh Contraction: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management
,”
Obstet. Gynecol.
,
115
(
2 Pt. 1
), pp.
325
330
.
14.
Kuehnert
,
N.
,
Kraemer
,
N. A.
,
Otto
,
J.
,
Donker
,
H. C. W.
,
Slabu
,
I.
,
Baumann
,
M.
,
Kuhl
,
C. K.
, and
Klinge
,
U.
,
2012
, “
In Vivo MRI Visualization of Mesh Shrinkage Using Surgical Implants Loaded With Superparamagnetic Iron Oxides
,”
Surg. Endoscopy Other Interventional Tech.
,
26
(
5
), pp.
1468
1475
.
15.
Henak
,
C. R.
,
Anderson
,
A. E.
, and
Weiss
,
J. A.
,
2013
, “
Subject-Specific Analysis of Joint Contact Mechanics: Application to the Study of Osteoarthritis and Surgical Planning
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
135
(
2
), p.
021003
.
16.
Henak
,
C. R.
,
Carruth
,
E. D.
,
Anderson
,
A. E.
,
Harris
,
M. D.
,
Ellis
,
B. J.
,
Peters
,
C. L.
, and
Weiss
,
J. A.
,
2013
, “
Finite Element Predictions of Cartilage Contact Mechanics in Hips With Retroverted Acetabula
,”
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
,
21
(
10
), pp.
1522
1529
.
17.
Sigal
,
I. A.
,
Flanagan
,
J. G.
,
Tertinegg
,
I.
, and
Ethier
,
C. R.
,
2009
, “
Modeling Individual-Specific Human Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics—Part II: Influence of Material Properties
,”
Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
99
109
.
You do not currently have access to this content.