Examine the biomechanical effect of material properties, geometric variables, and anchoring arrangements in a segmental pedicle screw with connecting rods spanning the entire lumbar spine using finite element models (FEMs). The objectives of this study are (1) to understand how different variables associated with posterior instrumentation affect the lumbar spine kinematics and stresses in instrumentation, (2) to compare the multidirectional stability of the spinal instrumentation, and (3) to determine how these variables contribute to the rigidity of the long-segment fusion in a lumbar spine. A lumbar spine FEM was used to analyze the biomechanical effects of different materials used for spinal rods (TNTZ or Ti or CoCr), varying diameters of the screws and rods (5 mm and 6 mm), and different fixation techniques (multilevel or intermittent). The results based on the range of motion and stress distribution in the rods and screws revealed that differences in properties and variations in geometry of the screw-rod moderately affect the biomechanics of the spine. Further, the spinal screw-rod system was least stable under the lateral bending mode. Stress analyzes of the screws and rods revealed that the caudal section of the posterior spinal instrumentation was more susceptible to high stresses and hence possible failure. Although CoCr screws and rods provided the greatest spinal stabilization, these constructs were susceptible to fatigue failure. The findings of the present study suggest that a posterior instrumentation system with a 5-mm screw-rod diameter made of Ti or TNTZ is advantageous over CoCr instrumentation system.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
Biomechanics
References
1.
Panjabi
, M. M.
, 1988
, “Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Fixation Devices—I: A Conceptual Framework
,” Spine
, 13
(10
), pp. 1129
–1134
.2.
Ambati
, D. V.
, Wright
, E. K.
, Jr., Lehman
, R. A.
, Jr, Kang, D. G., Wagner, S. C., and Dmitriev, A. E., 2015
, “Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Provides Superior Biomechanical Stability in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study
,” Spine J.
, 15
(8
), pp. 1812
–1822
.3.
Gong
, Z.
, Chen
, Z.
, Feng
, Z.
, Cao, Y., Jiang, C., and Jiang, X., 2014
, “Finite Element Analysis of 3 Posterior Fixation Techniques in the Lumbar Spine
,” Orthopedics
, 37
(5
), pp. e441
–e448
.4.
Galbusera
, F.
, Bassani
, T.
, La Barbera
, L.
, Ottardi, C., Schlager, B., Brayda-Bruno, M., Villa, T., and Wilke, H. J., 2015
, “Planning the Surgical Correction of Spinal deformities: Toward the Identification of the Biomechanical Principals by Means of Numerical Simulation
,” Front Bioeng. Biotechnol.
, 3
, p. 178
.5.
Rohlmann
, A.
, Burra
, N. K.
, Zander
, T.
, and Bergmann, G., 2007
, “Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Posterior Dynamic and Rigid Fixation Devices on the Loads in the Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 16
(8
), pp. 1223
–1231
.6.
Facchinello
, Y.
, Brailovski
, V.
, and Petit
, Y.
, 2014
, “Monolithic Superelastic Rods With Variable Flexural Stiffness for Spinal Fusion: Simplified Finite Element Analysis of an Instrumented Spine Segment
,” 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC
), Chicago, IL, Aug. 26--30, pp. 6605
–6608
.7.
Charosky
, S.
, Moreno
, P.
, and Maxy
, P.
, 2014
, “Instability and Instrumentation Failures After a PSO: A Finite Element Analysis
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 23
(11
), pp. 2340
–2349
.8.
Cunningham
, B. W.
, Sefter
, J. C.
, Shono
, Y.
, and McAfee, P. C., 1993
, “Static and Cyclical Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Spinal Constructs
,” Spine
, 18
(12
), pp. 1677
–1688
.9.
Chen
, P. Q.
, Lin
, S. J.
, Wu
, S. S.
, and So, H., 2003
, “Mechanical Performance of the New Posterior Spinal Implant: Effect of Materials, Connecting Plate and Pedicle Screw Design
,” Spine
, 28
(9
), pp. 881
–886
.10.
Pienkowski
, D.
, Stephens
, G. C.
, Doers
, T. M.
, and Hamilton, D. M., 1998
, “Multicycle Mechanical Performance of Titanium and Stainless Steel Transpedicular Spine Implants
,” Spine
, 23
(7
), pp. 782
–788
.11.
Metzger
, M. F.
, Robinson
, S. T.
, Svet
, M. T.
, Liu, J. C., and Acosta, F. L., 2016
, “Biomechanical Analysis of the Proximal Adjacent Segment After Multilevel Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine: Do Hooks Ease the Transition?
,” Global Spine J.
, 6
(4
), pp. 335
–343
.12.
Facchinello
, Y.
, Brailovski
, V.
, Petit
, Y.
, Brummund, M., Tremblay, J., and Mac-Thiong, J. M., 2015
, “Biomechanical Assessment of the Stabilization Capacity of Monolithic Spinal Rods With Different Flexural Stiffness and Anchoring Arrangement
,” Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)
, 30
(10
), pp. 1026
–1035
.13.
Han
, S.
, Hyun
, S. J.
, Kim, K. J., Jahng, T. A., Lee, S., and Rhim, S. C., 2017
, “Rod Stiffness as a Risk Factor of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Comparative Study Between Cobalt Chrome Multiple-Rod Constructs and Titanium Alloy Two-Rod Construct
,” Spine J.
, 17
(7
), pp. 962
–968
.14.
Ashman
, R. B.
, Birch
, J. G.
, Bone
, L. B.
, Corin, J. D., Herring, J. A., Johnston, C. E., II, Ritterbush, J. F., and Roach, J. W., 1988
, “Mechanical Testing of Spinal Instrumentation
,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
, 227
, pp. 113
–125
.15.
Ruberte
, L. M.
, Natarajan
, R. N.
, and Andersson
, G. B.
, 2009
, “Influence of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease on the Behavior of the Adjacent Segments—A Finite Element Study
,” J. Biomech.
, 42
(3
), pp. 341
–348
.16.
Natarajan
, R. N.
, and Andersson
, G. B.
, 2016
, “Lumbar Disc Degeneration is an Equally Important Risk Factor as Lumbar Fusion for Causing Adjacent Segment Disc Disease
,” J. Orthop. Res.
, 35
(1), pp. 123–130.17.
Qasim
, M.
, Hong
, J. T.
, Natarajan
, R. N.
, and An, H. S., 2013
, “A Biomechanical Comparison of Intralaminar C7 Screw Constructs With and Without Offset Connector Used for C6-7 Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Finite Element Study
,” J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.
, 53
(6
), pp. 331
–336
.18.
Natarajan
, R. N.
, Williams
, J. R.
, and Andersson
, G. B.
, 2006
, “Modeling Changes in Intervertebral Disc Mechanics With Degeneration
,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.
, 88
(Suppl. 2), pp. 36
–40
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7185215_Modeling_changes_in_intervertebral_disc_mechanics_with_degeneration19.
Williams
, J. R.
, Natarajan
, R. N.
, and Andersson
, G. B.
, 2007
, “Inclusion of Regional Poroelastic Material Properties Better Predicts Biomechanical Behavior of Lumbar Disc Subjected to Dynamic Loading
,” J. Biomech.
, 40
(9
), pp. 1981
–1987
.20.
Niinomi
, M.
, 2007
, “Fatigue Characteristics of Metallic Biomaterials
,” Int. J. Fatigue
, 29
(6
), pp. 992
–1000
.21.
Weinstein
, J. N.
, Spratt
, K. F.
, Spengler
, D.
, Brick, C., and Reid, S., 1988
, “Spinal Pedicle Fixation: Reliability and Validity of Roentgenogram-Based Assessment and Surgical Factors on Successful Screw Placement
,” Spine
, 13
(9
), pp. 1012
–1018
.22.
Rohlmann
, A.
, Bergmann
, G.
, and Graichen
, F.
, 1997
, “Loads on an Internal Spinal Fixation Device During Walking
,” J. Biomech.
, 30
(1
), pp. 41
–47
.23.
Renner
, S. M.
, Natarajan
, R. N.
, Patwardhan
, A. G.
, Havey, R. M., Voronov, L. I., Guo, B. Y., Andersson, G. B., and An, H. S., 2007
, “Novel Model to Analyze the Effect of a Large Compressive Follower Pre-Load on Range of Motions in a Lumbar Spine
,” J. Biomech.
, 40
(6
), pp. 1326
–1332
.24.
Li
, G.
, Wang
, S.
, Passias
, P.
, Xia, Q., Li, G., and Wood, K., 2009
, “Segmental In Vivo Vertebral Motion During Functional Human Lumbar Spine Activities
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 18
(7
), pp. 1013
–1021
.25.
Passiac
, P. G.
, Wang
, S.
, Kozanek
, M.
, Xia, Q., Li, W., Grottkau, B., Wood, K. B., and Li, G., 2011
, “Segmental Lumbar Rotation in Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain During Functional Weight-Bearing Activities
,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.
, 93
(1
), pp. 29
–37
.26.
Jutte
, P. C.
, and Castelein
, R. M.
, 2002
, “Complications of Pedicle Screws in Lumbar and Lumbosacral Fusions in 105 Consecutive Primary Operations
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 11
(6
), pp. 594
–598
.27.
Pihlajamaki
, H.
, Myllynen
, P.
, and Bostman
, O.
, 1997
, “Complications of Transpedicular Lumbosacral Fixation for Non-Traumatic Disorders
,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br.
, 79
(2
), pp. 183
–189
.28.
Farrokhi
, M. R.
, Razmkon
, A.
, Maghami, Z., and Nikoo, Z., 2010
, “Inclusion of the Fracture Level in Short Segment Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 19
(10
), pp. 1651
–1656
.29.
Chen
, C. S.
, Chen
, W. J.
, Cheng, C. K., Jao, S. H., Chueh, S. C., and Wang, C. C., 2005
, “Failure Analysis of Broken Pedicle Screws on Spinal Instrumentation
,” Med. Eng. Phys.
, 27
(6
), pp. 487
–496
.30.
Kwon
, B. K.
, Elgafy
, H.
, Keynan, O., Fisher, C. G., Boyd, M. C., Paquette, S. J., and Dvorak, M. F., 2006
, “Progressive Junctional Kyphosis at the Caudal End of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion: Etiology, Predictors, and Treatment
,” Spine
, 31
(17
), pp. 1943
–1951
.Copyright © 2018 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
