The flexibility matrix currently forms the basis for multibody dynamics models of cervical spine motion. While studies have aimed to determine cervical motion segment behavior, their accuracy and utility have been limited by both experimental and analytical assumptions. Flexibility terms have been primarily represented as constants despite the spine’s nonlinear stiffening response. Also, nondiagonal terms, describing coupled motions, of the matrices are often omitted. Currently, no study validates the flexibility approach for predicting vertebral motions; nor have the effects of matrix approximations and simplifications been quantified. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to quantify flexibility relationships for cervical motion segments, examine the importance of nonlinear components of the flexibility matrix, and determine the extent to which multivariable relationships may alter motion prediction. To that end, using unembalmed human cervical spine motion segments, a full battery of flexibility tests were performed for a neutral orientation and also following an axial pretorque. Primary and coupled matrix components were described using linear and piecewise nonlinear incremental constants. A third matrix approach utilized multivariable incremental relationships. Measured motions were predicted using structural flexibility methods and evaluated using RMS error between predicted and measured responses. A full set of flexibility relationships describe primary and coupled motions for C3-C4 and C5-C6. A flexibility matrix using piecewise incremental responses offers improved predictions over one using linear methods (p<0.01). However, no significant improvement is obtained using nonlinear terms represented by a multivariable functional approach (p<0.2). Based on these findings, it is suggested that a multivariable approach for flexibility is more demanding experimentally and analytically while not offering improved motion prediction.

1.
Camacho, D. L., Nightingale, R. W., Robinette, J. J., Vanguri, S. K., Coates, D. J., and Myers, B. S., 1997, “Experimental Flexibility Measurements for the Development of a Computational Head-Neck Model Validated for Near-Vertex Head Impact,” Proceedings of the 41st Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 473–486.
2.
de Jager, M., Sauren, A., Thunnissen, J., and Wismans, J., 1994, “A Three-Dimensional Head-Neck Model: Validation for Frontal and Lateral Impacts,” Proceedings of the 38th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 93–109.
3.
Deng
,
Y. C.
, and
Goldsmith
,
W.
,
1987
, “
Response of a Human Head/Neck/Upper-Torso Replica to Dynamic Loading-II. Analytical/Numerical Model
,”
J. Biomech.
,
20
, pp.
487
497
.
4.
Panjabi
,
M. M.
,
Brand
,
R. A.
, and
White
,
A. A.
,
1976
, “
Three-Dimensional Flexibility and Stiffness Properties of the Human Thoracic Spine
,”
J. Biomech.
,
9
, pp.
185
192
.
5.
Van Ee, C. A., Nightingale, R. W., Camacho, D. L. A., Chancey, V. C., Knaub, K. E., Sun, E., and Myers, B. S., 2000, “Tensile Properties of the Human Muscular and Ligamentous Cervical Spine,” Proceedings of the 44th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 85–102.
6.
Moroney
,
S. P.
,
Schultz
,
A. B.
,
Miller
,
J. A. A.
, and
Andersson
,
G. B. J.
,
1988
, “
Load-Displacement Properties of Lower Cervical Spine Motion Segments
,”
J. Biomech.
,
21, 9
, pp.
769
779
.
7.
Myers
,
B. S.
,
McElhaney
,
J. H.
,
Doherty
,
B. J.
,
Paver
,
J. G.
, and
Gray
,
L.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Torsion in Cervical Spine Trauma
,”
Spine
,
16
, pp.
870
874
.
8.
Raynor
,
R. B.
,
Moskovich
,
R.
,
Zidel
,
P.
, and
Pugh
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Alterations in Primary and Coupled Neck Motions after Facetectomy
,”
Neurosurgery
,
21
, pp.
681
687
.
9.
Shea
,
M.
,
Edwards
,
W. T.
,
White
,
A. A.
, and
Hayes
,
W. C.
,
1991
, “
Variation of Stiffness and Strength Along the Human Cervical Spine
,”
J. Biomech.
,
24
, pp.
95
107
.
10.
Wismans, J., and Spenny, C. H., 1984, “Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 161–171.
11.
Thunnissen, J., Wismans, J., Ewing, C. L., and Thomas, D. J., 1995, “Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: A New Analysis,” Proceedings of the 39th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 439–460.
12.
Wismans, J., and Spenny, C. H., 1983, “Performance Requirements for Mechanical Neck in Lateral Flexion,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 137–148.
13.
Wismans, J., van Oorschot, H., and Woltring, H. J., 1986, “Omni-Directional Human Head-Neck Response,” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 313–331.
14.
Berkson
,
M. H.
,
Nachemson
,
A.
, and
Schultz
,
A. B.
,
1979
, “
Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments-Part II: Responses in Compression and Shear: Influence of Gross Morphology
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
101
, pp.
53
57
.
15.
Edwards
,
W. T.
,
Hayes
,
W. C.
,
Posner
,
I.
,
White
,
A. A.
, and
Mann
,
R. W.
,
1987
, “
Variation in Lumbar Spine Stiffness with Load
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
109
, pp.
35
42
.
16.
Panjabi
,
M. M.
,
Summers
,
D. J.
,
Pelker
,
R. P.
,
Videman
,
T.
,
Friedlaender
,
G. E.
, and
Southwick
,
W. O.
,
1986
, “
Three-Dimensional Load-Displacement Curves due to Forces on the Cervical Spine
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
,
4
, pp.
152
161
.
17.
Schultz
,
A. B.
,
Warwick
,
D. N.
,
Berkson
,
M. H.
, and
Nachemson
,
A.
,
1979
, “
Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments—Part I: Responses in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bending, and Torsion
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
101
, pp.
46
52
.
18.
Panjabi
,
M. M.
,
Crisco
,
J. J.
,
Vasavada
,
A.
,
Oda
,
T.
,
Cholewicki
,
J.
,
Nibu
,
K.
,
Shin
,
E.
,
2001
, “
Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load-Displacement Curves
,”
Spine
,
26
, pp.
2692
2700
.
19.
Adams
,
L. P.
,
1981
, “
X-ray Stereo Photogrammetry Locating the Precise, Three-Dimensional Positions of Image Points
,”
Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.
,
19
, pp.
569
578
.
20.
Veldpaus
,
F. E.
,
Woltring
,
H. J.
, and
Dortmans
,
L. J. M. G.
,
1988
, “
A Least-Squares Algorithm for the Equiform Transformation from Spatial Marker Coordinates
,”
J. Biomech.
,
21
, pp.
45
54
.
21.
Woltring
,
H. J.
,
1980
, “
Planar Control in Multi-Camera Calibration for 3-D Gait Studies
,”
J. Biomech.
,
13
, pp.
39
48
.
22.
Woltring
,
H. J.
,
1991
, “
Representation and Calculation of 3-D Joint Movement
,”
Human Movement Science
,
10
, pp.
603
616
.
23.
Fung, Y. C. B., Perrone, N., and Anliker, M., 1972, Biomechanics: Its Foundations and Objectives, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
24.
Simon
,
B. R.
,
Coats
,
R. S.
, and
Woo
,
S. L. Y.
,
1984
, “
Relaxation and Creep Quasilinear Viscoelastic Models for Normal Articular Cartilage
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
106
, pp.
159
164
.
25.
Winkelstein
,
B. A.
,
Nightingale
,
R. W.
,
Richardson
,
W. J.
, and
Myers
,
B. S.
,
2000
, “
The Cervical Facet Capsule and its Role in Whiplash Injury: A Biomechanical Investigation
,”
Spine
,
25
, pp.
1239
1246
.
26.
Liu, Y. K., Krieger, K. W., Njus, G., Ueno, K., Connors, M. P., Wakano, K., and Thies, D., 1982, “Cervical Spine Stiffness and Geometry of the Young Human Male,” AFAMRL-TR-80-138, Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
27.
Goel
,
V. K.
,
Clark
,
C. R.
,
McGowan
,
D.
, and
Goyal
,
S.
,
1984
, “
An In-Vitro Study of the Kinematics of the Normal, Injured and Stabilized Cervical Spine
,”
J. Biomech.
,
17
, pp.
363
376
.
28.
Yang, K. H., Begeman, P. C., Muser, M., and Niederer, P., 1997, “On the Role of the Cervical Facet Joints in Rear End Impact Neck Injury Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the International Congress & Exposition, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE Paper #970497, pp. 127–129.
29.
Lysell
,
E.
,
1969
, “
Motion in the Cervical Spine
,”
Acta Orthop. Scand.
,
123
, pp.
5
61
.
30.
Siegmund
,
G. P.
,
Myers
,
B. S.
,
Davis
,
M. B.
,
Bohnet
,
H. F.
, and
Winkelstein
,
B. A.
,
2001
, “
Mechanical Evidence of Cervical Facet Capsule Injury During Whiplash: A Cadaveric Study using Combined Shear, Compression and Extension Loading
,”
Spine
,
26
, pp.
2095
2101
.
You do not currently have access to this content.