Due to both its shape and its structural architecture, the mechanics of the pelvic bone are complex. In Finite Element (FE) models, these aspects have often been (over) simplified, sometimes leading to conclusions which did not bear out in reality. The purpose of this study was to develop a more realistic FE model of the pelvic bone. This not only implies that the model has to be three-dimensional, but also that the thickness of the cortical shell and the density distribution of the trabecular bone throughout the pelvic bone have to be incorporated in the model in a realistic way. For this purpose, quantitative measurements were performed on computer tomography scans of several pelvic bones, after which the measured quantities were allocated to each element of the mesh individually. To validate this FE model, two fresh pelvic bones were fitted with strain gages and loaded in a testing machine. Stresses calculated from the strain data of this experiment were compared to the results of a simulation with the developed pelvic FE model.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Bone, Finite element model, Computers, Density, Finite element analysis, Machinery, Shapes, Shells, Simulation, Strain gages, Stress, Testing
1.
Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., and Rohlmann, A. “Instrumentation of a Hip Joint Prosthesis,” Implantable Telemetry in Orthopaedics, Bergmann, Graichen, Rohlmann, eds., Freie Universita¨t Berlin, 1990, pp. 35–63.
2.
Carter
D. R.
,
Vasu
R.
, and
Harris
W. H.
 “
Stress distributions in the acetabular region II: effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
15
,
1982
, pp.
165
–
170
.
3.
Dalstra, M., and Huiskes, R. “The Pelvic Bone as a Sandwich Construction; a Three Dimensional Finite Element Study,” Proc. ESB, Vol. 7, 1990, p. B32.
4.
Dalstra
M.
,
Huiskes
R.
,
Odgaard
A.
,
van Erning
L.
 “
Mechanical and Textural Properties of Pelvic Trabecular Bone
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
26
,
1993
, pp.
523
–
535
.
5.
Finlay
J. B.
,
Bourne
R. B.
,
Landsberg
P. D.
,
Andreae
P.
 “
Pelvic Stresses in vitro—I. Malsizing of Endoprostheses
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
19
,
1986
, pp.
703
–
714
.
6.
Goel
V. K.
,
Valliappan
S.
, and
Svensson
N. L.
 “
Stresses in the Normal Pelvis
,”
Comput. Biol. Med.
, Vol.
8
,
1978
, pp.
91
–
104
.
7.
Holm
N. J.
 “
The Development of a Two-Dimensional Stress-Optical Model of the Os Coxae
,”
Acta Orthop. Scand.
, Vol.
52
,
1981
, pp.
135
–
143
.
8.
Huiskes
R.
 “
Finite Element Analysis of Acetabular Reconstruction
,”
Acta Orthop. Scand
, Vol.
58
,
1987
, pp.
620
–
625
.
9.
Jacob
H. A. C.
,
Huggler
A. H.
,
Dietschi
C.
,
Schreiber
A.
 “
Mechanical Function of Subchondral Bone as Experimentally Determined on the Acetabulum of the Human Pelvis
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
9
,
1976
, pp.
625
–
627
.
10.
Kalender
W. A.
,
Suess
C.
 “
A Calibration Phantom for Quantitative Computed Tomography
,”
Med. Phys.
, Vol.
14
,
1987
, pp.
863
–
866
.
11.
Koeneman
J. B.
,
Hansen
T. M.
, and
Beres
K.
 “
Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Hip Joint
,”
ORS Trans.
, Vol.
14
,
1989
, p.
223
223
.
12.
Landjerit, B., Jacquard-Simon, N., Thourot, M., Massin, P. H. “Physiological Loadings on Human Pelvis: A Comparison Between Numerical and Experimental Simulations,” Proc. ESB, Vol. 8, 1992, p. 195.
13.
Lionberger
D.
,
Walker
P. S.
,
Granholm
J.
 “
Effects of Prosthetic Acetabular Replacement on Strains in the Pelvis
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
, Vol.
3
,
1985
, pp.
372
–
379
.
14.
Miles
A. W.
, and
McNamee
P. B.
 “
Strain gauge and photoelastic evaluation of the load transfer in the pelvis in total hip replacement: the effect of the position of the axis of rotation
,”
Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
203
,
1989
, pp.
103
–
107
.
15.
Oonishi
H.
,
Isha
H.
, and
Hasegawa
T.
 “
Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the articular hip joint—by means of the three dimensional finite element method
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
16
,
1983
, pp.
427
–
444
.
16.
Pedersen
D. R.
,
Crowninshield
R. D.
,
Brand
R. A.
, and
Johnston
R. C.
 “
An Axisymmetric Model of Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
15
,
1982
, pp.
305
–
315
.
17.
Petty
W.
,
Miller
G. J.
, and
Piotrowski
G.
 “
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Acetabular Prosthesis Implantation on Human Cadaver Pelves
,”
Bull. Pros. Res.
, Vol.
17
,
1980
, pp.
80
–
89
.
18.
Rapperport
D. J.
,
Carter
D. R.
, and
Schurman
D. J.
 “
Contact Finite Element Stress Analysis of the Hip Joint
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
, Vol.
3
,
1985
, pp.
435
–
446
.
19.
Renaudin, F., Lavaste, F., Skalli, W., Pecheux, C., and Scmitt, V. “A 3D Finite Element Model of Pelvis in Side Impact,” Proc. ESB, Vol. 8, 1992, p. 194.
20.
Ries
M.
,
Pugh
J.
,
Au
J. C.
,
Gurtowski
J.
, and
Dee
R.
 “
Cortical Pelvic Strains With Varying Size Hemiarthroplasty In Vitro
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
22
,
1989
, pp.
775
–
780
.
21.
Vasu
R.
,
Carter
D. R.
, and
Harris
W. H.
 “
Stress distributions in the acetabular region—I. before and after total joint replacement
,”
J. Biomech.
, Vol.
15
,
1982
, pp.
155
–
164
.
22.
Verdonschot, N., Huiskes, R. “FEM Analyses of Hip Prostheses: Validity of the 2-D Side-Plate Model and the Effects of Torsion,” Proc. ESB, Vol. 7, 1990, p. A20.
23.
Yoshioka
Y.
, and
Shiba
R.
 “
A Study of the Stress Analysis of the Pelvis by Means of the Three-Dimensional Photoelastic Experiments
,”
J. Jap. Orthop. Ass.
, Vol.
55
,
1981
, pp.
63
–
76
.
24.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. The Finite Element Method, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, London, 1977, pp. 272–276.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.