Elastomer based pressure sensitive adhesives used in various peeling applications are viscoelastic and expected to be rate sensitive. The effects of varying peel velocity on adhesion energy and its dependence on the peel angle and rate of peeling are investigated. Experiments are conducted on an adhesive tape using a displacement-controlled peel test configuration. By adjusting the peel arm length, the peel velocity can be continuously varied though the extremity of the film is displaced at a constant rate, which results in nonsteady peeling. Constant peel rate tests are performed over a wide range of peeling rates for a fixed peeling angle, which results in steady state peeling. Based upon the experimental data, a power law relation for the adhesive energy of a packaging tape and its dependence on the rate of peeling is presented. The applicability of the rate dependent law for adhesion energy based upon the steady state experiments to the nonsteady peeling process is critically examined.

References

1.
Benedek
,
I.
,
2004
,
Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives and Applications
,
Marcel Dekker
,
New York
.
2.
ASTM D903-98
,
2010
, “
Standard Test Method for Peel or Stripping Strength of Adhesive Bonds
,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3.
Meitl
,
M. A.
,
Zhu
,
Z. T.
,
Kumar
,
V.
,
Lee
,
K. J.
,
Feng
,
X.
,
Huang
,
Y. Y.
,
Adesida
,
I.
,
Nuzzo
,
R. G.
, and
Rogers
,
J. A.
,
2006
, “
Transfer Printing by Kinetic Control of Adhesion to an Elastomeric Stamp
,”
Nature Mater.
,
5
, pp.
33
38
.10.1038/nmat1532
4.
Tian
,
Y.
,
Pesika
,
N.
,
Zeng
,
H.
,
Rosenberg
,
K.
,
Zhao
,
B.
,
McGuiggan
,
P.
,
Autumn
,
K.
, and
Israelachivili
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Adhesion and Friction in Gecko Toe Attachment and Detachment
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
,
103
, pp.
19320
19325
.10.1073/pnas.0608841103
5.
Yao
,
H.
and
Gao
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Mechanics of Robust and Releasable Adhesion in Biology: Bottom-Up Designed Hierarchical Structures of Gecko
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
54
, pp.
1120
1146
.10.1016/j.jmps.2006.01.002
6.
Garrivier
,
D.
,
Decave
,
E.
,
Brechet
,
Y.
,
Bruckert
,
F.
, and
Fourcade
,
B.
,
2002
, “
Peeling Model for Cell Detachment
,”
Eur. Phys. J. E
,
8
(1), pp.
79
97
.10.1140/epje/i2002-10010-8
7.
Rivlin
,
R. S.
,
1944
, “
The Effective Work of Adhesion
,”
J. Paint Technol.
,
9
, pp.
215
218
.
8.
Thouless
,
M. D.
and
Yang
,
Q. D.
,
2008
, “
A Parametric Study of the Peel Test
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
28
, pp.
176
184
.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.006
9.
Williams
,
J. A.
and
Kauzlarich
,
J. J.
,
2005
, “
The Influence of Peel Angle on the Mechanics of Peeling Flexible Adherends With Arbitrary Load-Extension Characteristics
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
38
, pp.
951
958
.10.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.024
10.
Molinari
,
A.
and
Ravichandran
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Peeling of Elastic Tapes: Effects of Large Deformations, Pre-Straining, and Peel-Zone Model
,”
J. Adhes.
,
84
, pp.
961
995
.10.1080/00218460802576995
11.
Kim
,
K. S.
and
Aravas
,
N.
,
1988
, “
Elastoplastic Analysis of the Peel Test
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
24
, pp.
417
435
.10.1016/0020-7683(88)90071-6
12.
Wei
,
Y.
and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
1998
, “
Interface Strength, Work of Adhesion and Plasticity in the Peel Test
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
93
, pp.
315
333
.10.1023/A:1007545200315
13.
Gent
,
A. N.
and
Petrich
,
R. P.
,
1969
, “
Adhesion of Viscoelastic Materials to Rigid Substrates
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
310
, pp.
433
448
.10.1098/rspa.1969.0085
14.
Barthel
,
E.
and
Roux
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Velocity Dependent Adherence: An Analytical Approach for the JKR and DMT Models
,”
Langmuir
,
16
, pp.
8134
8138
.10.1021/la000474b
15.
Chen
,
H.
,
Feng
,
X.
,
Huang
,
Y.
,
Huang
,
Y.
, and
Rogers
,
J. A.
,
2013
, “
Experiments and Viscoelastic Analysis of Peel Test With Patterned Strips for Applications to Transfer Printing
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
61
, pp.
1737
1752
.10.1016/j.jmps.2013.04.001
16.
Pesika
,
N. S.
,
Tian
,
Y.
,
Zhao
,
B.
,
Rosenberg
,
K.
,
Zeng
,
H.
,
McGuiggan
,
P.
,
Autumn
,
K.
, and
Israelachivili
,
J. N.
,
2007
, “
Peel-Zone Model of Tape Peeling Based on the Gecko Adhesive System
,”
J. Adhes.
,
83
, pp.
383
401
.10.1080/00218460701282539
17.
Kendall
,
K.
,
1975
, “
Thin-Film Peeling—The Elastic Term
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
,
8
, pp.
1449
1452
.10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005
18.
Kovalchick
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Mechanics of Peeling: Cohesive Zone Law and Stability
,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
19.
Kovalchick
,
C.
,
Molinari
,
A.
, and
Ravichandran
,
G.
,
2013
, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Stability of Peeling for Adhesive Tapes
,”
Mech. Mater.
,
66
, pp.
69
78
.10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.07.012
20.
Molinari
,
A.
and
Ravichandran
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Stability of Peeling for Systems With Rate Independent Decohesion Energy
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
50
, pp.
1974
1980
.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.02.017
21.
Knauss
,
W. G.
,
2003
, “
Viscoelasticity and the Time-Dependent Fracture in Polymers
,”
Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Vol. 2: Fundamental Theories and Mechanisms of Failure
,
B. L.
Karihaloo
and
W. G.
Knauss
, eds.,
Elsevier
,
Oxford, UK
, pp.
383
428
.
You do not currently have access to this content.