Abstract
Type 2 high-pressure hydrogen vessels for storage at hydrogen refueling stations are designed assuming a predefined operational pressure cycle and targeted autofrettage conditions. However, the resulting finite life depends significantly on variables associated with the autofrettage process and the pressure cycles actually realized during service, which many times are not to the full range of the design. Clear guidance for cycle counting is lacking, therefore industry often defaults to counting every re-pressurization as a full range pressure cycle, which is an overly conservative approach. In-service pressure cycles used to predict the growth of cracks in operational pressure vessels results in significantly longer life, since most in-service pressure cycles are only a fraction of the full design pressure range. Fatigue crack growth rates can vary widely for a given pressure range depending on the details of the residual strains imparted during the autofrettage process because of their influence on crack driving forces. Small changes in variables associated with the autofrettage process, e.g., the target autofrettage overburden pressure, can result in large changes in the residual stress profile leading to possibly degraded fatigue life.
In this paper, computational simulation was used for sensitivity studies to evaluate the effect of both operating conditions and autofrettage conditions on fatigue life for Type 2 high-pressure hydrogen vessels. The analysis in this paper explores these sensitivities, and the results are used to provide guidance on cycle counting. In particular, we identify the pressure cycle ranges that can be ignored over the life of the vessel as having negligible effect on fatigue life. This study also examines the sensitivity of design life to the autofrettage process and the impact on life if the targeted residual strain is not achieved during manufacturing.
