This paper explores two alternative design philosophies for achieving target safety levels in fixed offshore structures. The first uses a Working Stress Design format, and examines the relationship between the return period of the metocean design criteria and the configured structural reliability. The second uses a Load and Resistance Factor Design format, and considers suitable environmental partial load factors required to achieve acceptable safety levels. An example case study of two unmanned structures demonstrates the importance of local environment and structural configuration in determining reliability. The results indicate that for certain combinations of structural configuration and environment, previously recommended design approaches appear inadequate. This study proposes more appropriate design criteria for two specific configurations on the North West Shelf of Australia.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2003 22nd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
June 8–13, 2003
Cancun, Mexico
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3682-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Alternative Design Philosophies for Achieving Target Safety Levels in Fixed Offshore Structures
Geoff Cole,
Geoff Cole
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Annalisa Ernestine,
Annalisa Ernestine
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
John Rooney
John Rooney
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Geoff Cole
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Annalisa Ernestine
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
John Rooney
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Paper No:
OMAE2003-37275, pp. 255-264; 10 pages
Published Online:
January 23, 2009
Citation
Cole, G, Ernestine, A, & Rooney, J. "Alternative Design Philosophies for Achieving Target Safety Levels in Fixed Offshore Structures." Proceedings of the ASME 2003 22nd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Volume 2: Safety and Reliability; Pipeline Technology. Cancun, Mexico. June 8–13, 2003. pp. 255-264. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2003-37275
Download citation file:
5
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Deterministic and Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis for Structural Integrity Assessment of Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2016)
A Reliability-Based Approach for the Design of Nuclear Piping for Internal Pressure
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2009)
Modeling Pop Action Pressure Relief Valve as a Bistable Element
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2015)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects
Expert Systems in Condition Monitoring
Tribology of Mechanical Systems: A Guide to Present and Future Technologies
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)