This paper discusses the effects of the method of crush initiation on the dynamic axial crush response of roll wrapped composite tubes. This constitutes a portion of a successful fundamental study conducted at GM R&D of the dynamic axial crush of automotive rail-sized composite tubes reinforced variously with carbon fiber, Kevlar® and hybrid combinations of the two, and manufactured using roll wrapping techniques suitable for the low cost high volume needs of the automotive industry. All tubes were manufactured using roll wrapping from multiple layers of uni-directional thermoset prepreg with the uni-directional fabric plies being oriented at ± 15° with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tube. A total of 21 dynamic axial crush tests were conducted using a free flight drop tower facility. Tests spanned a range of tube geometries — circular and square with different wall and cross section dimensions with cored and uncored walls and differing numbers of plies — and a range of drop heights/impact velocities and drop masses. A general finding was that stable and progressive crush occurred at acceptable load levels in all of the roll-wrapped tubes that were tested for all methods of crush initiation that were considered — a 45° lead end bevel either alone, with a zero radius plug-type crush initiator, or with a 12.7 mm radius plug. The method of crush initiation was, however, found to be capable of producing major differences in the crush initiation force Fp, the displacement average crush force Fav(D), the specific energy absorption SEA, and the crush morphology. As examples, both the displacement average value of dynamic axial crush force and the value of SEA were changed by as much as a factor of eight by the method of crush initiation.

Volume Subject Area:
Health and Safety
Keywords:
composite tubes, roll wrapped, energy absorption, crush initiators
Topics:
Absorption, Composite materials
1.
Browne, A. L., and Iobst, S. A., “Dynamic Axial Crush of Automotive Rail-Sized Composite Tubes Part 1: Tubes with Woven Reinforcements (Glass, Carbon, and Kevlar®) and Non-Plug Crush Initiators,” 17th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society of Composites, Oct. 2002, West Lafayette, IN.
2.
Browne, A. L., and Zimmerman, K. B., “Dynamic Axial Crush of Automotive Rail-Sized Composite Tubes Part 2: Tubes with Braided Reinforcements (Glass, Carbon, and Kevlar®) and Non-Plug Crush Initiators,” ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 11/19/02, New Orleans, LA.
3.
Browne, A. L., Iobst, S. and Zimmerman, K. B., “Dynamic Axial Crush of Automotive Rail-Sized Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite Tubes: Part III: Braided vs. Woven Reinforcements (Carbon, Kevlar®, and Glass) and Non-plug Crush Initiators,” ICCM, San Diego CA, 7/16/03.
4.
Browne, Alan L., and Johnson, Nancy L., “Dynamic Axial Crush of Automotive Rail-Sized Composite Tubes Part 5: Effects of Test Conditions Including Impact Velocity and Temperature,” ASC 18th Annual Technical Conference, 10/21/03, Gainesville, FL.
5.
Browne, Alan L., and Botkin, Mark E., “Dynamic Axial Crush of Automotive Rail-Sized Composite Tubes Part 4: Plug vs. Non-Plug Crush Initiators,” submitted for presentation at the ASC 19th Annual Technical Conference, 10/2004, Atlanta, GA.
6.
Botkin, M. E., et al, “Numerical Simulation of Post-Failure Dynamic Crushing of Composite Tubes,” Second International LS-DYNA3D Conference, San Francisco, CA, Sept. 1994.
7.
Agaram, V., et al, “Simulation of Controlled Failure of Automotive Composite Structures with LS-DYNA3D,” Proceedings of the 12th Annual ESD Advanced Composites Conference & Exposition, April 1997.
8.
Baccouche, M. R., and Mahmood, H. F., “Design of Extruded Aluminum Space Frame Front End Structures for Crash Energy Management — Part II,” AMD-Vol. 230/BED-Vol. 41, Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Biomechanics in Transportation Systems — 1998, ASME 1998.
9.
Hull
D.
, “
A Unified Approach to Progressive Crushing of Fibre-Reinforced Composite Tubes
,”
Composites Science and Technology
, Vol.
40
(
1991
), pp.
377
–
421
.
10.
Mamalis, A. G., Crashworthiness of Composite Thin-Walled Structural Components, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA, 1998.
11.
Hull, D., and Coppola, J. C., “Effect of Trigger Geometry on Crushing of Composite Tubes,” Materials and Processing — Move into the 90s, ed. S. Benson, T. Cook, E. Trewin, and R. M. Turner, Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1989, pp. 29–38.
12.
Johnson, N. L., et al, “Generic Tube Crush Program: Crush Tests of Structural Reaction Injection Molded Tubes,” Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Biomechanics in Transportation Systems - 1998, ASME Publication AMD-Vol. 230/BED-Vol. 41, pp. 53–73, Nov. 1998.
13.
Browne, A. L., et al, “Automotive Composites Consortium Generic Tube Crush Program: Resin Transfer Molded Tubes,” Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Biomechanics in Transportation Systems - 1998, ASME Publication AMD-Vol. 230/BED-Vol. 41, pp. 75–94, Nov. 1998.
14.
Johnson, N. L., et al, “Parameter Effects on the Dynamic Crush Performance of Braided ‘Hourglass’ Cross Section Composite Tubes,” presented at the 9th Annual ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference, 11/9/93, and published in the Conference Proceedings, Advanced Composites Technologies, pp. 403–419, ESD, 1993.
15.
Browne, A. L., “Automotive Composites Consortium Generic Tube Crush Program: Dynamic Crush Tests of Resin Transfer Molded Tubes,” American Society of Composites 13th Annual Technical Conference on Composite Materials, 9/22/1998, Baltimore, MD, and published in the proceedings.
16.
Johnson, N. L., et al, “ACC Generic Tube Crush Program: Comparison of Axial Crush of RTM and SRIM Tubes,” Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 14th Technical Conference, pp. 641–650, Sept. 1999.
17.
Botkin, M. E., et al, “Development of a Composite Front Structure for Automotive Crashworthiness,” Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Biomechanics in Transportation Systems - 1998, ASME Publication AMD-Vol. 230/BED-Vol. 41, pp. 95–114, Nov. 1998.
18.
Browne, A. L., and Johnson, N. L., “Conducting Dynamic Impact Tests of Composites Using a “Free-Flight” Drop Tower Facility,” Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 16th Technical Conference, Sept. 2001.
19.
Browne, A. L., and Johnson, N. L., “Conducting Dynamic Impact Tests Using a “Free-Flight” Drop Tower Facility Part I: Theory,” Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Bio-Mechanics in Transportation Systems — 2001, ASME Publication AMD — Vol. 251, Nov. 2001.
20.
Johnson, N. L., and Browne, A. L., “Conducting Dynamic Impact Tests Using a “Free-Flight” Drop Tower Facility Part II: Practical Aspects,” Crashworthiness, Occupant Protection and Bio-Mechanics in Transportation Systems — 2001, ASME Publication AMD — Vol. 251, Nov. 2001.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.