Strictly speaking, transition tasks such as those executed by robot hands involve free, impact, and constrained motion regimes, with changing dynamics. Impulsive, unilateral constraints arises in the impact regime, which makes very difficult to design a control system. Moreover, algebraic constraints arise in the constrained regime. The trivial approach would be to avoid impact, and to commute consistently ODE- and DAE-based controller, or to impose virtual constraints to model as a DAE system all regimes. In any case, it is required to know exactly the commuting time. In this paper, a very simple control scheme is proposed based on avoiding impact regime, through zero transition velocity from free to constrained motion, therefore impulsive dynamics does not appear. This is possible because we guarantee exactly the time to commute with a novel well-posed finite time convergence scheme, to produce convergence toward any desired trajectory at any given arbitrarily time and for any initial condition. In this way, ODE and DAE dynamics/controllers commute stably. Inertial and gravitational forces are compensated by a recurrent neural network driven by image-based position and force tracking errors, with a decentralized structure for each robot. The network is tuned on line with a second order force-position sliding modes to finally guarantee exponential tracking.

1.
Cotter
N. E.
. “
The Stone-Weierstrass Theorem and Its Application to Neural Network
.”
IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks
, Vol.
1
No.
4
,
1990
pp.
290
295
.
2.
Hutchinson
S.
,
Hager
G.
,
Corke
P.
,
A tutorial on visual servo control
,
Trans. on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
12
No.
5
pp.
651
670
3.
V. Parra-Vega, R. Garcia-Rodriguez, and L. de la Rosa-Jimenez, “Cartesian Neuro-sliding PID Control of Robots for Tracking under Inverse Jacobian Uncertainty,” 2nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp., 2004.
4.
V. Parra-Vega, S. Arimoto, Y.H. Liu, and T. Naniwa, “Model-Based Adaptive Control for RobotManipulators under Holonomic Constraints, IFAC Symposium on Robot Control SYROCO 1994, Capri, Italy, September 1994, pages 475–480.
5.
Liu
Y. H.
,
Arimoto
S.
,
Kitagaki
S.
, and
Parra-Vega
V.
,: “
Model-based adaptive and distributed controller for holonomic cooperations of multiple manipulators
,”
Int. Journal of Control
, Vol.
67
, no.
5
, pp.
649
673
,
1997
.
6.
Parra-Vega
V.
and
Arimoto
S.
,
A “Passivity-based Adaptive Sliding Mode Position-Force Control for Robot Manipulators
,”
International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
, Vol.
10
, pp.
365
377
,
1996
.
7.
Parra-Vega
V.
,
Arimoto
S.
,
Liu
Y. H.
,
Hirzinger
G.
, and
Akella
P.
, “
Dynamic sliding PID control for tracking of robot manipulators: Theory and experiments
,
IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
19
, pp.
7
9
,
2003
.
8.
Parra-Vega
V.
, “
Second Order Sliding Mode Control for Robot Arms with Time Base Generator for Finite-Time Tracking
,”
Dynamics and Control
, Vol.
11
, pp.
174
186
,
2001
.
9.
V. Parra-Vega, A. Castillo-Tapia, L. G. Garcia-Valdovinos, “Decentralized model-free continuous control for robot manipulators: tracking in finite time,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control Ro-MoCo ’02., 2002., 9–11 Nov. 2002, pp. 159–164.
10.
E. Lee, Park, J., Schrader, C.B.; P.-H. Chang, Impact when robots act wisely, Proceedings. ICRA ’03. IEEE International Conference on Page(s): 3692–3697 vol. 3 14–19.
11.
Y. Wu, T.-J. Tarn, N. Xi, A. Isidori, On robust impact control via positive acceleration feedback for robot manipulators, Proceedings., 1996 IEEE International Conference on Page(s): 1891–1896 vol. 2 22–28.
12.
Pagilla
P. R.
,
Yu
B.
,
An experimental study of planar impact of a robotmanipulator
,
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
, Volume:
9
, Issue:
1
, March
2004
pp.
123
128
13.
Shoji
Y.
;
Inaba
M.
;
Fukuda
T.
,
Impact control of grasping
,
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
, Jun
1991
Volume:
38
Issue:
3
,
187
194
.
14.
Tornambe
A.
,
Global regulation of a planar robot armstriking a surface
,
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Volume:
41
, Issue:
10
, Oct.
1996
, pp.
1517
1521
.
15.
Prokop
G.
,
Pfeiffer
F.
,
Synthesis of robot dynamic behavior for environmental interaction
,
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
, Volume:
14
, Issue:
5
, Oct.
1998
pp.
718
731
.
16.
Brogliato
B.
;
Orhant, Contact Stability Analysis of a One Degree-of-Freedom Robot
,
Dynamics and Control
, January
1998
, vol.
8
, no.
1
, pp.
37
53
(17)
17.
B. Brogliato, Impacts inMechanical Systems. Analysis and Modeling, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 551.
18.
Sarkar
N.
,
Yun
X.
,
Ellis
R.
,
Live-Constraint-Based Control for Contact Transitions
,
Tran. on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
14
, No.
5
,
743
754
,
1998
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.